MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00404-008-0787-0

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2008

Which route of misoprostol application is more advantageous prior to fractional curettage in postmenopausal patients?

Temel Muge, Goynumer Fikret Gokhan, Wetherilt Lale, Durukan Birol

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness and potential side effects of oral, vaginal, and sublingual intake of misoprostol on cervical dilatation prior to fractional curettage in patients with postmenopausal bleeding.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with postmenopausal bleeding during a period of 18 months were included in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were given 400 microg of misoprostol through the vaginal, oral, and sublingual routes, 12 h prior to the fractional curettage procedure. The degree of cervical dilatation, duration of the procedure, the side effects and complications were noted.

RESULTS

When compared with the control group, misoprostol administered orally or sublingually was found to have a significant effect on cervical dilatation (P < 0.05). Of the three groups, nausea was found to be more common in the orally administered misoprostol group.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the oral or sublingual application of misoprostol prior to fractional curettage in patients with postmenopausal bleeding decreases the need for cervical dilatation.

Для цитирования: Temel Muge, Goynumer Fikret Gokhan, Wetherilt Lale, Durukan Birol. Which route of misoprostol application is more advantageous prior to fractional curettage in postmenopausal patients?. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-008-0787-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.