Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses · 2026
Automated Systems and Early Mobilization Programs for Bedridden Patients: A Systematic Review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ferrer-Franquesa Andreu, Torra-Bou Joan Enric, Barranco-I-Reixachs David, Bravo Cristina
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Patients with reduced mobility face elevated risks of complications, including pressure ulcers and functional decline. Automated beds and robotic mobility systems are emerging tools to support early mobilization and reduce caregiver burden, but their overall impact remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence on the effectiveness of automated bed systems and robotic mobility technologies compared to conventional care in improving clinical and functional outcomes in immobile adult patients.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar from inception to September 29, 2025. Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) with neurological conditions or immobility receiving automated or robotic mobilization interventions compared with standard care. Outcomes of interest were motor function, quality of life, hemodynamic stability, caregiver workload, and cost-effectiveness. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed with validated tools. A narrative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity in study design and outcomes.
RESULTS: Nine studies involving 380 patients met the inclusion criteria. Robotic and automated systems were associated with improved functional outcomes, reduced incidence of pressure injuries, and enhanced caregiver efficiency. Heterogeneity in study design and intervention protocols precluded meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION: Automated and robotic mobility systems may support early mobilization and improve care outcomes in immobile patients. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm their long-term clinical and economic benefits.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence on the effectiveness of automated bed systems and robotic mobility technologies compared to conventional care in improving clinical and functional outcomes in immobile adult patients.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar from inception to September 29, 2025. Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) with neurological conditions or immobility receiving automated or robotic mobilization interventions compared with standard care. Outcomes of interest were motor function, quality of life, hemodynamic stability, caregiver workload, and cost-effectiveness. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed with validated tools. A narrative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity in study design and outcomes.
RESULTS: Nine studies involving 380 patients met the inclusion criteria. Robotic and automated systems were associated with improved functional outcomes, reduced incidence of pressure injuries, and enhanced caregiver efficiency. Heterogeneity in study design and intervention protocols precluded meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION: Automated and robotic mobility systems may support early mobilization and improve care outcomes in immobile patients. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm their long-term clinical and economic benefits.