Automated Systems and Early Mobilization Programs for Bedridden Patients: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION

Patients with reduced mobility face elevated risks of complications, including pressure ulcers and functional decline. Automated beds and robotic mobility systems are emerging tools to support early mobilization and reduce caregiver burden, but their overall impact remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence on the effectiveness of automated bed systems and robotic mobility technologies compared to conventional care in improving clinical and functional outcomes in immobile adult patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar from inception to September 29, 2025. Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) with neurological conditions or immobility receiving automated or robotic mobilization interventions compared with standard care. Outcomes of interest were motor function, quality of life, hemodynamic stability, caregiver workload, and cost-effectiveness. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed with validated tools. A narrative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity in study design and outcomes.

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 380 patients met the inclusion criteria. Robotic and automated systems were associated with improved functional outcomes, reduced incidence of pressure injuries, and enhanced caregiver efficiency. Heterogeneity in study design and intervention protocols precluded meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Automated and robotic mobility systems may support early mobilization and improve care outcomes in immobile patients. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm their long-term clinical and economic benefits.