Surgery · 2019
Complete and incomplete recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: Characterizing paralysis and paresis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schneider Max, Dahm Valerie, Passler Christian, Sterrer Elisabeth, Mancusi Gudrun, Repasi Robert, Gschwandtner Elisabeth, Fertl Elisabeth, Handgriff Laura, Hermann Michael
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve and consequent disorder of vocal fold movement is a typical complication in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. During postoperative laryngoscopy we observed not only a complete standstill (vocal fold paralysis), but also a hypomobility (paresis). In this prospective study, we investigated the difference in incidence and prognosis as well as risk-factors, intraoperative neuromonitoring, and symptoms between vocal fold paralysis and vocal fold paresis.
METHODS: Data were prospectively collected and analyzed in a single high-volume thyroid center between 2012 and 2016. Vocal fold paresis was defined as hypomobility in abduction or adduction, a reduction in range and speed of vocal fold movement. Vocal fold paralysis was defined as asymmetry and missing purposeful vocal fold movement.
RESULTS: The study included 4,707 surgeries and 7,992 at-risk nerves at risk. Vocal fold paralysis was diagnosed in 374 patients (4.68% of 7,992 nerves at risk) and vocal fold paresis in 114 patients (1.43%). Exclusively in the paralysis group, 36 patients (0.45%) developed permanent loss of vocal fold function (P < .001). In follow-up, vocal fold paresis patients regain normal vocal fold function significantly earlier than vocal fold paralysis (mean duration: 6.96 ± 6.506 vs 10.77 ± 7,827 weeks) and presented with significantly less symptoms like hoarseness, diplophonia, dysphagia, and dyspnea (68.8% vs 95.9 %). In intraoperative neuromonitoring, vocal fold paresis showed a significantly higher postresectional N. vagus amplitude than vocal fold paralysis patients (0.349 mV vs 0.114 mV, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: After thyroidectomy, vocal fold paresis must be distinguished from vocal fold paralysis and should be implemented as a separate outcome parameter in the postoperative quality assessment.
METHODS: Data were prospectively collected and analyzed in a single high-volume thyroid center between 2012 and 2016. Vocal fold paresis was defined as hypomobility in abduction or adduction, a reduction in range and speed of vocal fold movement. Vocal fold paralysis was defined as asymmetry and missing purposeful vocal fold movement.
RESULTS: The study included 4,707 surgeries and 7,992 at-risk nerves at risk. Vocal fold paralysis was diagnosed in 374 patients (4.68% of 7,992 nerves at risk) and vocal fold paresis in 114 patients (1.43%). Exclusively in the paralysis group, 36 patients (0.45%) developed permanent loss of vocal fold function (P < .001). In follow-up, vocal fold paresis patients regain normal vocal fold function significantly earlier than vocal fold paralysis (mean duration: 6.96 ± 6.506 vs 10.77 ± 7,827 weeks) and presented with significantly less symptoms like hoarseness, diplophonia, dysphagia, and dyspnea (68.8% vs 95.9 %). In intraoperative neuromonitoring, vocal fold paresis showed a significantly higher postresectional N. vagus amplitude than vocal fold paralysis patients (0.349 mV vs 0.114 mV, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: After thyroidectomy, vocal fold paresis must be distinguished from vocal fold paralysis and should be implemented as a separate outcome parameter in the postoperative quality assessment.