Journal of immunological methods · 1982
Comparison and evaluation of different methods for alpha-MSH labelling.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ghanem G, Legros F, Lejeune F, Frühling J
Аннотация
We have studied the behaviour of 125I-labelled alpha-MSH under different experimental conditions. Until now, the chloramine T method had been used by most investigators with variable results. We have tested three other labelling techniques based on 125I mild oxidation: (1) an enzymatic method with lactoperoxidase, (2) a sparingly soluble chloramine method (T.D.G.U.) and (3) modified chloramine T procedure, 'the iodine volatilization method'. Labelled hormone obtained after each kind of iodination was assayed for immunoreactivity. In addition, time course degradation was measured by classical RIA incubation procedures. Charcoal-dextran was used to separate bound and free antigen. We have found chloramine T-iodinated alpha-MSH to be significantly more damaged than preparations obtained by other methods and to be less stable when stored at -18 degrees C. No differences were found between the differently labelled 125I-labelled alpha-MSH fresh preparations in binding to surface receptors of human melanoma cell lines in culture.