MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2007

[Parotidectomy of deep-lobe tumors].

Zhang Nai-song, Wei Wei, Sun Jun-yong

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate advantages of the superficial lobe preservation in the parotidectomy of deep-lobe tumors, which include much lower incidence in postparotidectomy depression, variable aesthetic deformities, facial nerve injury and Frey's syndrome.

METHODS

This retrospective review included 114 patients with benign parotid gland tumors hospitalized from 2001 to 2004, among which 13 patients with deep-lobe parotid tumors and 101 patients in the superficial lobe of parotid gland. Seven in the 13 patients with deep-lobe tumors were operated with the method of the superficial lobe preservation.

RESULTS

During median 3 years and 3 months following-up, no any cases with either tumor recurrence, permanent facial nerve injury, postparotidectomy depression, or Frey's syndrome was found in the 7 operated patients. Only 1 case with the facial nerve marginal mandibular branch palsy occurred, but completely recovered over a 3-month period of time.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of the superficial lobe for deep-lobe tumors parotidectomy could decrease the incidence of parotidectomy complications without any influence in the treatment effect. Additionally, the parotid function preservation and cosmetic appearance after operation also satisfy both the patients and surgeons.

Для цитирования: Zhang Nai-song, Wei Wei, Sun Jun-yong. [Parotidectomy of deep-lobe tumors].. Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery. 2007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.