Frontiers in public health · 2026
Relationship between resilience, social support, and mental health in breast cancer patients based on the four-quadrant health model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sui Shuangrui, Ma Weicong, Tan Zhihui, Feng Kai, Yan Weitao, Su Xueying
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a major public health problem that exposes patients to persistent physical symptoms and psychological distress across diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Objective: This study explored the associations of resilience and social support with mental health indicators among individuals with breast cancer and examined whether a Four-Quadrant Health Model could distinguish clinically meaningful physical-psychological risk profiles.
METHODS: This secondary cross-sectional analysis used baseline data from a parent breast cancer care-management project. A convenience sample of 1,052 breast cancer inpatients and follow-up patients was analyzed. Measures included the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Social Support Rating Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Fear of Progression Questionnaire, and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Breast Cancer module. Primary analyses retained continuous scores for correlation and regression models. The four-quadrant classification was used as an additional clinical stratification framework based on physical symptom burden and HADS-defined psychological status. Pearson correlations, hierarchical multiple linear regression, and one-way ANOVA with robustness checks were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Resilience showed a weak positive association with social support (r = 0.04) and significant negative associations with anxiety, depression, and fear of illness progression (r = -0.18 to -0.24, p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression showed standardized β coefficients of -0.26 for resilience and -0.08 for social support after adjustment for age, explaining 22.3% of the variance in mental distress (F(3, 1,048) = 100.3, p < 0.001). Significant differences in the mental distress composite were observed across the four quadrants (F(3, 1,048) = 565.8, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.62).
CONCLUSION: Higher resilience and stronger social support were independently associated with lower psychological distress among breast cancer patients, with resilience showing the stronger association. The Four-Quadrant Health Model distinguished clinically meaningful risk profiles and may support psychosocial triage when used alongside continuous assessment. Because this was a secondary cross-sectional analysis based on convenience sampling from one tertiary hospital, the findings should be interpreted as associations and confirmed in longitudinal, multi-center studies.
METHODS: This secondary cross-sectional analysis used baseline data from a parent breast cancer care-management project. A convenience sample of 1,052 breast cancer inpatients and follow-up patients was analyzed. Measures included the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Social Support Rating Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Fear of Progression Questionnaire, and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Breast Cancer module. Primary analyses retained continuous scores for correlation and regression models. The four-quadrant classification was used as an additional clinical stratification framework based on physical symptom burden and HADS-defined psychological status. Pearson correlations, hierarchical multiple linear regression, and one-way ANOVA with robustness checks were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Resilience showed a weak positive association with social support (r = 0.04) and significant negative associations with anxiety, depression, and fear of illness progression (r = -0.18 to -0.24, p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression showed standardized β coefficients of -0.26 for resilience and -0.08 for social support after adjustment for age, explaining 22.3% of the variance in mental distress (F(3, 1,048) = 100.3, p < 0.001). Significant differences in the mental distress composite were observed across the four quadrants (F(3, 1,048) = 565.8, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.62).
CONCLUSION: Higher resilience and stronger social support were independently associated with lower psychological distress among breast cancer patients, with resilience showing the stronger association. The Four-Quadrant Health Model distinguished clinically meaningful risk profiles and may support psychosocial triage when used alongside continuous assessment. Because this was a secondary cross-sectional analysis based on convenience sampling from one tertiary hospital, the findings should be interpreted as associations and confirmed in longitudinal, multi-center studies.