MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.061

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric surgery · 2012

Vinyl glove ingestion in children: a word of caution.

Stringel Gustavo, Parker Michael, McCoy Erin

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Vinyl gloves when ingested will harden and develop sharp edges producing gastric bezoars; bowel obstruction; and, ultimately, perforation. We report 4 children with complications secondary to vinyl glove ingestion who required surgical intervention.

METHODS

A 3-year-old boy, a 13-year-old adolescent girl with Down syndrome, a 14-year-old adolescent girl, and a 15-year-old adolescent boy presented with bowel obstruction secondary to a bezoar caused by a vinyl glove. The adolescent girl with Down syndrome presented again at age 17 years with a large vinyl glove gastric bezoar. Three of the children had mental retardation, and 1 was a victim of child abuse. Three had laparoscopic-assisted removal of the vinyl glove bezoar, and 1 had laparotomy.

RESULTS

The 4 children recovered uneventfully. Two of the patients had unsuspected intestinal perforation. The caretakers denied awareness of the vinyl glove ingestion.

CONCLUSIONS

Vinyl glove ingestion can cause intestinal obstruction and perforation. Vinyl gloves should be removed from the immediate proximity of mentally retarded patients or patients with pica. Most of the time, the finding of vinyl gloves as etiology of the obstruction or perforation is incidental. If the event is known or witnessed, prompt surgical intervention is generally recommended.

Для цитирования: Stringel Gustavo, Parker Michael, McCoy Erin. Vinyl glove ingestion in children: a word of caution.. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.061.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.