MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.05.012

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2012

A ten year review of civilian iliac vessel injuries from a single trauma centre.

Oliver J C, Bekker W, Edu S, Nicol A J, Navsaria P H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To report the surgical management and outcome of iliac vessel (IV) injuries in a civilian trauma centre with a high incidence of penetrating trauma.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND

METHODS

A retrospective record review of patients with IV injuries treated between January 2000 and December 2009.

RESULTS

Sixty nine patients, 59 with gunshot wounds, sustained 108 iliac vessel injuries. Mean revised trauma and injury severity scores was 7.06 and 28.4, respectively. Twenty nine patients required damage control laparotomy. Common or external iliac arteries were repaired by primary repair (10), temporary shunt with delayed graft (6), interposition graft (5) or ligation if limb non-viable (3). Forty-seven patients had injuries to the common or external iliac vein, 42 were ligated. Mortality was 25% and 6 survivors required amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

In a stable patient a primary arterial repair is preferred but a temporary shunt can be a life and limb saving option in the unstable patient. Ligating the common or external iliac veins is associated with a low incidence of prolonged leg swelling.

Для цитирования: Oliver J C, Bekker W, Edu S, Nicol A J, Navsaria P H. A ten year review of civilian iliac vessel injuries from a single trauma centre.. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.05.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.