Feasibility and safety of the discontinuation of systemic immunosuppressive treatment after single-unit cord blood transplantation in adults.

Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established therapeutic modality for intractable hematological disorders. However, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a significant problem in allogeneic HCT. Therefore, effective GVHD prevention is crucial for the success of allogeneic HCT. Unlike solid organ transplantation, immunosuppressive treatment (IST) used to prevent or treat GVHD can typically be reduced or discontinued in allogeneic HCT recipients, although the optimal timings of such reductions and discontinuations have been unclear [ 1 – 3 ]. In high-risk hematopoietic malignancies, early dose reduction or discontinuation of IST may be used to induce a graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect, but the efficacy of this approach is not clear [ 4 – 9 ]. Concerns also exist that early reduction or discontinuation of IST may lead to an increase in subsequent chronic GVHD [ 9 – 12 ]. Nevertheless, recent several reports suggest that the early reduction or discontinuation of IST is safe in haploidentical related donor HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide [ 13 – 15 ].

When a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related or unrelated donor is unavailable, cord blood transplantation (CBT) is a well-established therapeutic alternative for adult patients [ 16 – 21 ]. Our previous studies have shown that CBT can produce a more potent graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect [ 22 , 23 ], resulting in a lower post-transplantation relapse rate [ 24 ], despite typically lower incidences and severities of chronic GVHD after single-unit CBT compared to conventional adult donor allogeneic HCT [ 16 – 19 , 21 , 25 , 26 ]. Furthermore, T cell immune reconstitution is delayed after CBT compared to conventional adult donor HCT [ 27 , 28 ]. Given the distinct immunological characteristics following CBT, the optimal timing of dose reduction or discontinuation of IST for GVHD prophylaxis may vary depending on donor type and graft source [ 1 – 3 ], but the clinical management of IST after CBT remains largely unexplored. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes associated with the discontinuation of IST following single-unit unrelated CBT in adults using cyclosporine (CSP)-based GVHD prophylaxis at our institute.

Methods

Patient selection and transplant procedures

Between August 1998 and September 2023, 336 adult patients underwent single-unit CBT as their initial allogeneic HCT at the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo. Among them, 16 patients who could not achieve neutrophil engraftment and 11 patients who died without neutrophil engraftment were excluded from this retrospective study. Finally, 309 patients were included in this study. Unrelated cord blood units were supplied by the cord blood bank in Japan. Conditioning regimens, GVHD prophylaxis, and supportive care were determined by the treating physicians according to patient and disease characteristics [ 29 – 32 ]. None of the patients received antithymocyte globulin, alemtuzumab, or rituximab as part of their conditioning regimen or GVHD prophylaxis. Regardless of the development of GVHD or disease relapse, our institute followed almost all patients who were still alive for medications and examinations for at least five years. This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo (2023-55-1019).

Immunosuppressive treatment schedule

All patients received CSP as a GVHD prophylaxis for CBT in our institute, with or without a short course of methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Patients younger than 59 years and those without comorbidity received CSP and MTX, while patients older than 60 years or those with comorbidity received CSP and MMF [ 29 , 30 , 32 ]. CSP was administered intravenously every day, starting on day −1 at a dose of 3 mg/kg/day. MTX was administered intravenously at 15 mg/m 2 on days +1, followed by 10 mg/m 2 on days +3 and +6. MMF was administered orally at a dose of 30 mg/kg/day from day 0 to day +27. We tapered CSP beginning between weeks +4 and +8, withdrawing 10–20% of the starting dose per week, if there was no evidence of active GVHD or mixed chimerism. Patients received oral CSP at a dose of 1:2–2.5, based on their last intravenous dose, once they could tolerate it. Physicians could freely modify the CSP dose for patients experiencing acute GVHD, CSP toxicity, or disease relapse risk. For patients who developed grade II or higher acute GVHD except for the involvement of skin alone, nephrotoxicity, or neurotoxicity mainly due to CSP, CSP was discontinued and switched to steroid therapy. Finally, in the absence of GVHD, we could discontinue CSP or steroids between 3 and 12 months after CBT.

Definitions

The steroid therapy was defined as systemic administration equivalent to 0.5 mg/kg/day or more prednisolone after CBT. Discontinuation of IST was defined as the first data of discontinuation of all systemic administration of immunosuppressive drugs, such as calcineurin inhibitors, and steroids. The degree of HLA matching was determined based on antigenic levels for HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR loci in the graft-versus-host direction. The HCT-Specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) [ 33 ] and refined Disease Risk Index (DRI) [ 34 ] were classified according to published criteria. The diagnosis of acute and chronic GVHD was based on previously established standard criteria [ 35 , 36 ]. Relapse was defined as the hematological recurrence of the underlying hematological disease. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was defined as death without hematological recurrence of the underlying hematological disease. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from the date of CBT until death, relapse, or survival. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of CBT until death or survival.

Statistical analysis

The probability of the discontinuation of IST, extensive chronic GVHD, NRM, and relapse was calculated using cumulative incidence curves, taking into account competing risks, and Gray’s test was used for group comparisons. The competing event for discontinuation of IST was relapse, death, or late graft failure before the event. Death before the event was considered the competing event for extensive chronic GVHD. Regarding NRM, relapse was a competing event, and vice versa. The probability of DFS and OS was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, with group comparisons performed using the log-rank test.

Factors influencing the discontinuation of IST were evaluated using the Fine and Gray model in the univariate and multivariate analyses, using the following factors: the requirement for steroid therapy (no requirement vs. requirement), age (<45 vs. ≥45 years), HCT-CI (0–2 vs. ≥ 3), disease type (myeloid vs. other than myeloid), refined DRI (low/intermediate vs. high/very high), cryopreserved cord blood total nucleated cell (TNC) dose (<2.5 × 10 7 /kg vs. ≥2.5 × 10 7 /kg), number of HLA disparities (0, 1 vs. 2), sex incompatibility (female donor to male recipient vs. others), ABO incompatibility (match, minor mismatch vs. major, bidirectional mismatch), and year of CBT (1998–2009 vs. 2010–2023), with the requirement for steroid therapy treated as a time-dependent covariate.

To clarify the impact of the discontinuation of IST on extensive chronic GVHD, NRM, relapse, DFS, and OS following single-unit CBT, multivariate analysis was performed using the Fine and Gray model for extensive chronic GVHD, NRM, and relapse, and a Cox proportional hazards model for DFS and OS. In these models, the discontinuation of IST and the requirement for steroid therapy were treated as time-varying covariates. The following factors associated with the impact of the discontinuation of IST on extensive chronic GVHD, NRM, relapse, DFS, and OS were considered in the multivariate analysis: the situation of IST (discontinuation of IST vs. continuation of IST), requirement for steroid therapy (no requirement vs. requirement), age (<45 vs. ≥45 years), HCT-CI (0–2 vs. ≥ 3), disease type (myeloid vs. other than myeloid), refined DRI (low/intermediate vs. high/very high), cryopreserved cord blood TNC dose (<2.5 × 10 7 /kg vs. ≥2.5 × 10 7 /kg), number of HLA disparities (0, 1 vs. 2), sex incompatibility (female donor to male recipient vs. others), ABO incompatibility (match, minor mismatch vs. major, bidirectional mismatch), and year of CBT (1998–2009 vs. 2010–2023). Age and cord blood TNC were categorized based on the approximate median value. The impact of the discontinuation of IST on transplant outcomes was evaluated using a landmark analysis at day 180 after CBT, corresponding to the date by which around 50% of patients had discontinued IST.

All P -values were two-sided, and the data were analyzed using EZR version 1.61 (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan) [ 37 ], a graphical user interface for the R 4.2.3 software program (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). P -values < 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Results

Patient characteristics and GVHD incidences

Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics and CBTs of the 309 patients. At the time of CBT, the median age of recipients was 44 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 33–51 years). Of the patients, 183 (59.2%) were male, and 36 (12.3%) had an HCT-CI ≥ 3. The most common indications for CBT were acute myelogenous leukemia ( n = 169; 54.7%), followed by acute lymphoblastic leukemia ( n = 61; 19.7%) and myelodysplastic syndrome ( n = 37; 12.0%). The majority of conditioning regimens were total body irradiation 12 Gy, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and high-dose cytarabine 12 g/m 2 ( n = 228; 73.8%) [ 29 , 32 ]. The most common GVHD prophylaxis was CSP and MTX ( n = 260; 84.1%), followed by CSP and MMF ( n = 46; 14.9%) and CSP alone ( n = 3; 1.0%). The median cryopreserved cord blood TNC dose and CD34 + cell dose was 2.53 × 10 7 /kg (IQR: 2.15–3.04 × 10 7 /kg) and 0.98 × 10 5 /kg (IQR: 0.72–1.26 × 10 5 /kg), respectively. The number of HLA antigen mismatches at HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 between recipients and cord blood units was 0 or 1 in 108 (35.0%) patients and 2 in 201 (65.0%) patients. Regarding sex compatibility, 89 (28.8%) patients received a female donor to male recipient transplant (Table 1 ).

In the entire cohort, the cumulative incidence of grade II–IV acute GVHD and grade III–IV acute GVHD at 100 days was 70.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.5–75.6%) and 13.0% (95% CI: 9.5–17.0%), respectively. Of the 219 patients who developed grade II–IV acute GVHD, 90 (41.0%) required steroid therapy. Of the 40 patients who developed grade III–IV acute GVHD, 38 (95.0%) required steroid therapy.

Factors and incidences of discontinuation of IST

With a median follow-up of 121 months (IQR: 67–279 months) for survivors, 247 patients discontinued IST, whereas 8 patients continued it. Among the remaining 54 patients, 27 experienced a hematological recurrence of underlying hematological disease, 26 died of NRM, and one experienced late graft failure, all of which are competing events for discontinuation of IST.

The cumulative incidence of the discontinuation of IST was 25.9% (95% CI: 21.2–30.9%) at 100 days, 46.2% (95% CI: 40.5–51.6%) at 180 days, 62.8% (95% CI: 57.1–68.0%) at 1 year, 72.8% (95% CI: 67.4–77.5%) at 2 years, and 79.3% (95% CI: 74.2–83.4%) at 5 years post-CBT (Fig. 1 ).

In the univariate analysis using the Fine and Gray proportional hazards model, the requirement for steroid therapy was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of the discontinuation of IST after CBT (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.33–0.58; P < 0.001), whereas immunosuppression was discontinued significantly more frequently in transplants performed more recently (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.14–1.89; P = 0.003) (Table 2 ). In the multivariate analysis using the Fine and Gray proportional hazards model, the requirement for steroid therapy (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.34–0.63; P < 0.001) and the recent calendar year of CBT (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.35–2.37; P < 0.001) remained significant factors for the discontinuation of IST after CBT (Table 2 ).

We also evaluated the effects of the development of acute GVHD on the discontinuation of IST. In the univariate analysis using the Fine and Gray proportional hazards model, in which the development of acute GVHD was treated as a time-dependent covariate, we found that developed grade III-IV acute GVHD was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of the discontinuation of IST after CBT (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.23–0.58; P < 0.001), but not developed grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.77–1.33; P = 0.892).

Impact of discontinuation of IST on extensive chronic GVHD

In the conditional landmark analysis at 180 days, the cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD at 5 years was 6.8% (95% CI: 2.8–13.4%) for patients who continued IST and 6.1% (95% CI: 2.7–11.5%) for patients who discontinued IST ( P = 0.725 by Gray’s test) (Fig. 2 ). In the multivariate analysis, when continuation of IST was used as the reference group, discontinuation of IST was not associated with the development of extensive chronic GVHD (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.27–3.72; P = 0.989) (Table 3 ).

Impact of discontinuation of IST on NRM and relapse

In the conditional landmark analysis at 180 days, the cumulative incidence of NRM at 5 years was 8.6% (95% CI: 4.5–14.3%) for patients who continued IST and 6.9% (95% CI: 3.2–12.6%) for patients who discontinued IST ( P = 0.162 by Gray’s test) (Fig. 3A ). In the multivariate analysis, discontinuation of IST was not associated with NRM (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.20–1.21; P = 0.122) (Table 3 ). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years was 11.4% (95% CI: 6.7–17.5%) for patients who continued IST and 23.8% (95% CI: 16.6–31.8%) for patients who discontinued IST ( P = 0.011 by Gray’s test) (Fig. 3B ). However, discontinuation of IST was not associated with relapse in the multivariate analysis (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.61–3.46; P = 0.388) (Table 3 ).

Impact of discontinuation of IST on DFS and OS

In the conditional landmark analysis at 180 days, the probability of DFS at 5 years was 80.1% (95% CI: 72.2–86.0%) for patients who continued IST and 69.2% (95% CI: 60.1–76.7%) for patients who discontinued IST ( P = 0.196 by log-rank test) (Fig. 3C ). In the multivariate analysis, discontinuation of IST was not associated with treatment failure (1-DFS) (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.47–1.61; P = 0.676) (Table 3 ). The probability of OS at 5 years was 82.9% (95% CI: 75.2–88.4%) for patients who continued IST and 78.0% (95% CI: 69.3–84.5%) for patients who discontinued IST ( P = 0.489 by log-rank test) (Fig. 3D ). In the multivariate analysis, discontinuation of IST was not associated with overall mortality (1-OS) (HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 0.95–3.82; P = 0.065) (Table 3 ).

Failure of IST discontinuation

Among the 247 patients who discontinued IST, 31 (12.6%) resumed IST, with a median time to re-initiation of IST at 777 days (range: 105–4670 days) after CBT. There was no significant difference in the median day of discontinuation of IST after CBT between patients who resumed IST and those who did not (165 days vs. 158 days, P = 0.618 by the Mann–Whitney U test). The median time to re-initiation of IST after initial discontinuation of IST was 231 days (range: 13–3473 days). The cumulative incidence of re-initiation of IST was 6.1% (95% CI: 3.6–9.6%) at 180 days, 7.8% (95% CI: 4.9–11.7%) at 1 year, 9.2% (95% CI: 6.0–13.4%) at 2 years, and 11.8% (95% CI: 8.0–16.5%) at 5 years after initial discontinuation of IST (Fig. 4 ). The main causes of the re-initiation of IST were the development of chronic GVHD ( n = 24), cryptogenic organizing pneumonia or bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia ( n = 4), and pneumonia caused by infections ( n = 3). In the multivariate analysis using the Fine and Gray proportional hazards model, age ≥45 years was significantly associated with an increased incidence of re-initiation of IST (HR: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.22–7.37; P = 0.016), whereas the recent calendar year of CBT was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of re-initiation of IST (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17–0.92; P = 0.032) (Table 4 ). Of the 31 patients who resumed IST, 17 (54.8%) were able to discontinue it again, with a median duration of IST administration of 305 days (range: 11–2842 days), whereas 1 patient continued to receive IST. Among the remaining 13 patients, 10 died of NRM, and 3 experienced a hematological recurrence of the underlying hematological disease while receiving IST.

Discussion

The timing of IST discontinuation may depend not only on the presence of active GVHD but also on stem cell source and genetic relationship with donor. Previous studies have shown that HLA-mismatched unrelated donors and the use of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were associated with lower rates of IST discontinuation [ 1 , 3 , 38 ]. Despite limited data on IST management after CBT, several studies, including our previous study have shown a significantly higher rate of IST discontinuation in patients who underwent CBT compared to those who received conventional adult donor HCT [ 2 , 25 , 26 ]. Our data also showed that the incidence of IST discontinuation was 79.3% at 5 years post-CBT, and the requirement for steroid therapy and early periods of CBT (1998–2009) were risk factors for IST discontinuation failure. Although the cause of the requirement for steroid therapy could mainly be due to the treatment for severe GVHD, or toxicity of CSP, the failure of IST discontinuation during the early periods of CBT may indicate a notable shift in IST discontinuation practice among treating physicians at our institute [ 39 ]. Thus, our findings suggest that the discontinuation of IST is a frequent occurrence among adult patients who underwent single-unit CBT.

Several studies have evaluated the effect of the timing of IST discontinuation on subsequent chronic GVHD in allogeneic HCT from adult donors [ 9 – 11 ]. Mengarelli et al. showed that discontinuation of IST over 12 months led to an increased risk of subsequent extensive chronic GVHD in allogeneic PBSC transplantation from matched sibling donors [ 11 ], whereas Kansu et al. did not find a difference in subsequent chronic GVHD between a 6-month and 24-month course of CSP prophylaxis in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from matched sibling donors or alternative donors [ 10 ]. In the context of CBT, our study demonstrated that discontinuation did not affect the subsequent extensive chronic GVHD. Moreover, 12.6% of patients resumed IST mainly due to developing chronic GVHD after initially discontinuing IST. This rate is lower than the previously reported data for adult donors, where 37.1% of patients resumed IST [ 3 ]. This difference might be partly due to the lower incidence of chronic GVHD in CBT [ 16 – 19 , 21 , 25 , 26 ]. Therefore, our results suggest that the use of cord blood may promote higher immune tolerance without requiring prolonged IST.

Early dose reduction or discontinuation of IST could be an attractive strategy to augment the GVT effects, particularly for high-risk hematopoietic malignancies, as suggested by single-arm studies [ 4 – 7 ]. Moreover, the induction of GVL effects through the rapid tapering of IST has proven beneficial for treating post-transplant relapse for certain hematological malignancies [ 40 – 42 ]. However, the majority of previous comparative studies failed to confirm the efficacy of early dose reduction or discontinuation of IST in reducing post-transplant relapse in allogeneic HCT from adult donors [ 3 , 11 ]. In contrast, Inamoto et al. showed that the discontinuation of IST prevented relapse in patients without GVHD during the first 18 months after HCT [ 8 ]. In our analysis of CBT among patients who survived at least 180 days without relapse, discontinuation of IST was associated with an increased risk of relapse in the univariate analysis but did not maintain this association in the multivariate analysis. Moreover, discontinuation of IST was associated with a trend toward overall mortality in multivariate analysis. These might be partly due to the selection bias inherent in retrospective studies because IST was discontinued early in patients with a very high risk of disease relapse. Therefore, a prospective interventional trial should be conducted to clarify the role of early dose reduction or discontinuation of IST in reducing post-transplant relapse in CBT.

Our study had several limitations. First, its retrospective nature implies that variations in clinical practices among treating physicians and disease activity may have influenced the timing of reductions and discontinuations of IST and the study’s outcomes. Second, our data only included single-unit CBT because double-unit CBT was not approved for use outside of clinical trials during the study period in Japan. Several studies have shown that double-unit CBT mediated a higher incidence of severe GVHD than single-unit CBT [ 43 , 44 ]. Moreover, calcineurin inhibitors and MMF, but not MTX, were commonly used for GVHD prophylaxis for CBT in US and European centers [ 45 , 46 ]. Recently, the annual number of CBT is decreasing around the world, because rates of HLA-haploidentical HCT continue to expand owing to the application of posttransplant cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis [ 47 ]. Therefore, we should exercise caution when extrapolating our findings to double-unit CBT or Western countries. Nonetheless, the inclusion of a homogeneous population of adult patients undergoing single-unit CBT using CSP-based GVHD prophylaxis with a median follow-up period of 10 years is a strength of our study.

In summary, our data showed that successful discontinuation of IST is relatively common after single-unit CBT in adults. Among patients who survived at least 180 days without relapse, discontinuation of IST did not affect subsequent extensive chronic GVHD, relapse, or survival, suggesting that discontinuation of IST within this timeframe is both feasible and safe for adults undergoing single-unit CBT in a real-world setting. A prospective interventional trial should be conducted to clarify the role of early dose reduction or discontinuation of IST in reducing post-transplant relapse in CBT. Our data can provide insight into the feasibility and safety of the early discontinuation of systemic IST after single-unit CBT.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all of the physicians and staff at our hospital for their help in this study.

Author contributions

TK designed the research, collected and analyzed the data, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. MMO collected the data. All the other authors contributed to data collection. All authors approved the final version.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by The University of Tokyo.

Data availability

Data may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

1. Pidala J, Lee SJ, Quinn G, Jim H, Kim J, Anasetti C. Variation in management of immune suppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2011;17:1528–36. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.03.006

2. Konuma T, Kato S, Oiwa-Monna M, Ishii H, Tojo A, Takahashi S. Comparison of graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival of transplantation using matched sibling donor, matched unrelated donor or unrelated cord blood after myeloablative conditioning for adult patients with hematological malignancies. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016;57:2126–32. 10.3109/10428194.2015.1122784

3. Pidala J, Martens M, Anasetti C, Carreras J, Horowitz M, Lee SJ, et al. Factors associated with successful discontinuation of immune suppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:e192974. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2974

4. Abraham R, Szer J, Bardy P, Grigg A. Early cyclosporine taper in high-risk sibling allogeneic bone marrow transplants. Bone Marrow Transpl. 1997;20:773–7. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700961

5. Shaw PJ, Afify Z. Rapid tapering of cyclosporin to maximise the graft-versus-leukaemia effect. Bone Marrow Transpl. 1999;23:632–3. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701642

6. Hori A, Kami M, Ohnishi M, Murashige N, Kojima R, Takaue Y. Feasibility of early tapering of cyclosporine following reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation for advanced hematologic or solid malignancies. Haematologica. 2005;90:1001–3.

7. Liu QF, Fan ZP, Zhang Y, Jiang ZJ, Wang CY, Xu D, et al. Sequential intensified conditioning and tapering of prophylactic immunosuppressants for graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2009;15:1376–85. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.06.017

8. Inamoto Y, Flowers ME, Lee SJ, Carpenter PA, Warren EH, Deeg HJ, et al. Influence of immunosuppressive treatment on risk of recurrent malignancy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2011;118:456–63. 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330217

9. Yang J, Cai Y, Jiang J, Wan L, Bai H, Zhu J, et al. Early tapering of immunosuppressive agents after HLA-matched donor transplantation can improve the survival of patients with advanced acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol. 2018;97:497–507. 10.1007/s00277-017-3204-6

10. Kansu E, Gooley T, Flowers ME, Anasetti C, Deeg HJ, Nash RA, et al. Administration of cyclosporine for 24 months compared with 6 months for prevention of chronic graft-versus-host disease: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Blood. 2001;98:3868–70. 10.1182/blood.V98.13.3868

11. Mengarelli A, Iori AP, Romano A, Cerretti R, Cerilli L, De Propris MS, et al. One-year cyclosporine prophylaxis reduces the risk of developing extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2003;88:315–23.

12. Burroughs L, Mielcarek M, Leisenring W, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, Baron F, et al. Extending postgrafting cyclosporine decreases the risk of severe graft-versus-host disease after nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation. Transplantation. 2006;81:818–25. 10.1097/01.tp.0000203556.06145.5b

13. Kasamon YL, Fuchs EJ, Zahurak M, Rosner GL, Symons HJ, Gladstone DE, et al. Shortened-duration tacrolimus after nonmyeloablative, HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2018;24:1022–8. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.01.011

14. DeZern AE, Elmariah H, Zahurak M, Rosner GL, Gladstone DE, Ali SA, et al. Shortened-duration immunosuppressive therapy after nonmyeloablative, related HLA-haploidentical or unrelated peripheral blood grafts and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2020;26:2075–81. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.037

15. Moore J, Hamad N, Gottlieb D, Bajel A, Ritchie D, Yeung D, et al. Early cessation of calcineurin inhibitors is feasible post-haploidentical blood stem cell transplant: the ANZHIT 1 study. Blood Adv. 2023;7:5554–65. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009840

16. Takahashi S, Iseki T, Ooi J, Tomonari A, Takasugi K, Shimohakamada Y, et al. Single-institute comparative analysis of unrelated bone marrow transplantation and cord blood transplantation for adult patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2004;104:3813–20. 10.1182/blood-2004-03-1001

17. Takahashi S, Ooi J, Tomonari A, Konuma T, Tsukada N, Oiwa-Monna M, et al. Comparative single-institute analysis of cord blood transplantation from unrelated donors with bone marrow or peripheral blood stem-cell transplants from related donors in adult patients with hematologic malignancies after myeloablative conditioning regimen. Blood. 2007;109:1322–30. 10.1182/blood-2006-04-020172

18. Eapen M, Rocha V, Sanz G, Scaradavou A, Zhang MJ, Arcese W, et al. Effect of graft source on unrelated donor haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in adults with acute leukaemia: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:653–60. 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70127-3

19. Terakura S, Atsuta Y, Tsukada N, Kobayashi T, Tanaka M, Kanda J, et al. Comparison of outcomes of 8/8 and 7/8 allele-matched unrelated bone marrow transplantation and single-unit cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2016;22:330–8. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.10.006

20. Shouval R, Fein JA, Labopin M, Kröger N, Duarte RF, Bader P, et al. Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched and alternative donors: a European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry retrospective analysis. Lancet Haematol. 2019;6:e573–84. 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30158-9

21. Konuma T, Kanda J, Yamasaki S, Harada K, Shimomura Y, Terakura S, et al. Single cord blood transplantation versus unmanipulated haploidentical transplantation for adults with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission. Transpl Cell Ther. 2021;27:334.e1–11. 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.01.023

22. Konuma T, Kanda J, Kuwatsuka Y, Yanada M, Kondo T, Hirabayashi S, et al. Differential effect of graft-versus-host disease on survival in acute leukemia according to donor type. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:4825–35. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4856

23. Konuma T, Matsuda K, Shimomura Y, Tanoue S, Sugita J, Inamoto Y, et al. Effect of graft-versus-host disease on post-transplantation outcomes following single cord blood transplantation compared with haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for adult acute myeloid leukemia. Transpl Cell Ther. 2023;29:365.e1–11. 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.03.001

24. Milano F, Gooley T, Wood B, Woolfrey A, Flowers ME, Doney K, et al. Cord-blood transplantation in patients with minimal residual disease. N. Engl J Med. 2016;375:944–53. 10.1056/NEJMoa1602074

25. Liu HL, Sun ZM, Geng LQ, Wang XB, Ding KY, Tong J, et al. Similar survival, but better quality of life after myeloablative transplantation using unrelated cord blood vs matched sibling donors in adults with hematologic malignancies. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2014;49:1063–9. 10.1038/bmt.2014.102

26. Gutman JA, Ross K, Smith C, Myint H, Lee CK, Salit R, et al. Chronic graft versus host disease burden and late transplant complications are lower following adult double cord blood versus matched unrelated donor peripheral blood transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2016;51:1588–93. 10.1038/bmt.2016.186

27. Bejanyan N, Brunstein CG, Cao Q, Lazaryan A, Luo X, Curtsinger J, et al. Delayed immune reconstitution after allogeneic transplantation increases the risks of mortality and chronic GVHD. Blood Adv. 2018;2:909–22. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017014464

28. Ando T, Tachibana T, Tanaka M, Suzuki T, Ishiyama Y, Koyama S, et al. Impact of graft sources on immune reconstitution and survival outcomes following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood Adv. 2020;4:408–19. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001021

29. Konuma T, Kato S, Ooi J, Oiwa-Monna M, Ebihara Y, Mochizuki S, et al. Single-unit cord blood transplantation after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-combined myeloablative conditioning for myeloid malignancies not in remission. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2014;20:396–401. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.12.555

30. Konuma T, Kato S, Isobe M, Mizusawa M, Oiwa-Monna M, Takahashi S, et al. Reduced-toxicity myeloablative conditioning consisting of Fludarabine/Busulfan/Low-Dose total body irradiation/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-combined cytarabine in single cord blood transplantation for elderly patients with nonremission myeloid malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2019;25:764–70. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.004

31. Mizusawa M, Konuma T, Kato S, Isobe M, Shibata H, Suzuki M, et al. Clinical outcomes of persistent colonization with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative rods in adult patients undergoing single cord blood transplantation. Int J Hematol. 2020;111:858–68. 10.1007/s12185-020-02854-5

32. Konuma T, Ooi J, Nagayama H, Tomonari A, Tsukada N, Kato S, et al. Long-term outcomes following the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-combined high-dose cytarabine to total body irradiation and cyclophosphamide conditioning in single-unit cord blood transplantation for myeloid malignancies. Ann Hematol. 2022;101:177–89. 10.1007/s00277-021-04676-9

33. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG, et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2005;106:2912–9. 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2004

34. Armand P, Kim HT, Logan BR, Wang Z, Alyea EP, Kalaycio ME, et al. Validation and refinement of the disease risk index for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2014;123:3664–71. 10.1182/blood-2014-01-552984

35. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transpl. 1995;15:825–8.

36. Sullivan KM, Agura E, Anasetti C, Appelbaum F, Badger C, Bearman S, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease and other late complications of bone marrow transplantation. Semin Hematol. 1991;28:250–9.

37. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013;48:452–8. 10.1038/bmt.2012.244

38. Stewart BL, Storer B, Storek J, Deeg HJ, Storb R, Hansen JA, et al. Duration of immunosuppressive treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2004;104:3501–6. 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0200

39. Takano K, Konuma T, Monna-Oiwa M, Isobe M, Kato S, Takahashi S, et al. Prognostic impact of switching from cyclosporine to corticosteroids early after single cord blood transplantation. Ann Hematol. 2022;101:2377–8. 10.1007/s00277-022-04916-6

40. Brandenburg U, Gottlieb D, Bradstock K. Antileukemic effects of rapid cyclosporin withdrawal in patients with relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma. 1998;31:545–50. 10.3109/10428199809057613

41. Elmaagacli AH, Beelen DW, Trenn G, Schmidt O, Nahler M, Schaefer UW. Induction of a graft-versus-leukemia reaction by cyclosporin A withdrawal as immunotherapy for leukemia relapsing after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 1999;23:771–7. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701672

42. Kekre N, Kim HT, Thanarajasingam G, Armand P, Antin JH, Cutler C, et al. Efficacy of immune suppression tapering in treating relapse after reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2015;100:1222–7. 10.3324/haematol.2015.129650

43. Wagner JE Jr, Eapen M, Carter S, Wang Y, Schultz KR, Wall DA, et al. One-unit versus two-unit cord-blood transplantation for hematologic cancers. N. Engl J Med. 2014;371:1685–94. 10.1056/NEJMoa1405584

44. Michel G, Galambrun C, Sirvent A, Pochon C, Bruno B, Jubert C, et al. Single- vs double-unit cord blood transplantation for children and young adults with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2016;127:3450–7. 10.1182/blood-2016-01-694349

45. Ponce DM, Politikos I, Alousi A, Carpenter PA, Milano F, MacMillan ML, et al. Guidelines for the prevention and management of graft-versus-host disease after cord blood transplantation. Transpl Cell Ther. 2021;27:540–4. 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.03.012

46. Kanda J, Hayashi H, Ruggeri A, Kimura F, Volt F, Takahashi S, et al. The impact of GVHD on outcomes after adult single cord blood transplantation in European and Japanese populations. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2022;57:57–64. 10.1038/s41409-021-01479-4

47. Nagler A, Mohty M. In 2022, which is preferred: haploidentical or cord transplant? Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2022;2022:64–73. 10.1182/hematology.2022000327

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

Data may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.