MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0003489418776343

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2018

Quality, Readability, and Trends for Websites on Ankyloglossia.

Aaronson Nicole Leigh, Castaño Johnathan Edward, Simons Jeffrey P, Jabbour Noel

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the quality and readability of websites on ankyloglossia, tongue tie, and frenulectomy.

METHODS

Google was queried with six search terms: tongue tie, tongue tie and breastfeeding, tongue tie and frenulectomy, ankyloglossia, ankyloglossia and breastfeeding, and ankyloglossia and frenulectomy. Website quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease Score, and Fry readability formula. Correlations were calculated. Search terms were analyzed for frequency using Google Trends and the NCBI database.

RESULTS

Of the maximum of 80, average DISCERN score for the websites was 65.7 (SD = 9.1, median = 65). Mean score for the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level was 11.6 (SD = 3.0, median = 10.7). Two websites (10%) were in the optimal range of 6 to 8. Google Trends shows tongue tie searches increasing in frequency, although the NCBI database showed a decreased in tongue tie articles.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the websites on ankyloglossia were of good quality; however, a majority were above the recommended reading level for public health information. Parents increasingly seek information on ankyloglossia online, while fewer investigators are publishing articles on this topic.

Для цитирования: Aaronson Nicole Leigh, Castaño Johnathan Edward, Simons Jeffrey P, Jabbour Noel. Quality, Readability, and Trends for Websites on Ankyloglossia.. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0003489418776343.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.