MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s41747-025-00615-9

Медицинская библиотека · European radiology experimental · 2025

Quantitative MRI Dixon signal drop and fat fraction for differentiating bone marrow lesions: a two-center prospective analysis.

Metwally Maha Ibrahim, Almalki Yassir Edrees, Khalil Marwa Fathy, Alsowey Ahmed Mohamed, Tantawy Hazem Ibrahim Aly, Hamed Mohamed Gaber, Abdelmoneem Shimaa, Alduraibi Sharifa Khalid, Almushayti Ziyad A, Alshehri Shaker Hassan S, Basha Ahmed M Abdelkhalik, Basha Mohammad Abd Alkhalik

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow (BM) lesion differentiation remains challenging, and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may enhance accuracy over conventional methods. We evaluated the diagnostic value and inter-reader reliability of Dixon-based signal drop (%drop) and fat fraction percentage (%fat) as adjuncts to existing protocols.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

In this prospective two-center study, 172 patients with BM signal abnormalities underwent standardized 1.5-T MRI protocols, including Dixon sequences. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently evaluated images and performed quantitative measurements of %drop and %fat. Final diagnoses were established through histopathology (n = 96) or imaging follow-up (n = 76). Diagnostic value was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), inter-reader reliability using Cohen's κ coefficient.

RESULTS

The consensus optimal cutoff was for %drop ≤ 19.8%, yielding 87.2% accuracy, 95.3% sensitivity, and 73.8% specificity, and that for %fat was ≤ 18.3%, achieving 86.6% accuracy, 96.3% sensitivity, and 70.8% specificity. Both metrics showed high diagnostic performance (AUROC 0.824-0.863) and excellent inter-reader reliability (κ > 0.93, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified %drop ≤ 19.8% and %fat ≤ 18.3% as the strongest independent predictors of malignancy, with odds ratio (OR) being 9.38 and 8.85, respectively (p < 0.001). Signal characteristics on Dixon sequences provided additional diagnostic value, with signal voids on fat-only images (OR 7.14) and high signals on water-only images (OR 5.46).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative MRI Dixon imaging parameters demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and excellent inter-reader reliability in differentiating benign and malignant BM lesions, supporting their implementation in clinical practice protocols as a reproducible adjunct to conventional MRI.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Quantitative Dixon MRI provides reproducible, noninvasive differentiation of bone marrow lesions with high diagnostic accuracy across anatomical sites, enhancing clinical decision-making with standardized thresholds while demonstrating excellent inter-center consistency.

KEY POINTS: Quantitative Dixon MRI thresholds of %drop ≤ 19.8% and %fat ≤ 18.3% were established as reliable predictors of malignancy in bone marrow lesions. Dixon metrics demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy (86.6-87.2%), compared to conventional T1-weighted sequences (79.2%). Excellent inter-reader reliability (κ = 0.895-0.943) supports the reproducibility of quantitative Dixon MRI in clinical practice.

Для цитирования: Metwally Maha Ibrahim, Almalki Yassir Edrees, Khalil Marwa Fathy, Alsowey Ahmed Mohamed, Tantawy Hazem Ibrahim Aly, Hamed Mohamed Gaber, Abdelmoneem Shimaa, Alduraibi Sharifa Khalid, Almushayti Ziyad A, Alshehri Shaker Hassan S, Basha Ahmed M Abdelkhalik, Basha Mohammad Abd Alkhalik. Quantitative MRI Dixon signal drop and fat fraction for differentiating bone marrow lesions: a two-center prospective analysis.. European radiology experimental. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-025-00615-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.