MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1650271

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in psychology · 2025

Exploring the predictors of academic performance: the role of personality, rational beliefs, and self-efficacy.

Coşa Lucica Emilia, Cernat Vasile

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the predictive roles of personality traits, rational/irrational beliefs, and self-efficacy in academic performance, while also investigating how these factors interact with gender, residence, and school type.

METHODS

Data were collected from 453 students at George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology in Târgu Mureş using the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (SES), and the short-form Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (ABSs).

RESULTS

Results revealed that institutional factors, particularly high school type, emerged as the strongest predictors of academic performance. Among the psychological traits, aggressiveness/hostility, impulsive sensation seeking, and rationality significantly predicted academic performance. Notably, impulsive sensation seeking was positively linked to higher performance in female but not male students, while aggressiveness/hostility predicted better performance only among students with high self-efficacy.

DISCUSSION: These findings highlight the potential for tailored intervention programs that take into account gender and personality differences to improve academic outcomes.

Для цитирования: Coşa Lucica Emilia, Cernat Vasile. Exploring the predictors of academic performance: the role of personality, rational beliefs, and self-efficacy.. Frontiers in psychology. 2025. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1650271.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.