MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00192-008-0678-8

Медицинская библиотека · International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2008

Incidence of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse 10 years following primary surgical management: a retrospective cohort study.

Fialkow Michael F, Newton Katherine M, Weiss Noel S

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We conducted this study to estimate the rate of, and identify risk factors for, recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) following primary surgical repair. The study consisted of a retrospective cohort study of 142 women who underwent primary surgical management of POP in 1993 and were followed up to 10 years. Prolapse severity was graded using an established classification system of clinical descriptors. Hazard ratios (HR) for recurrent POP were determined using Cox regression. 36 recurrent cases were identified (recurrence rate: 3.7 per 100 woman-years). A cystocele was the most frequent element of primary (87%) and recurrent (72%) prolapse. No predictors of the likelihood of recurrence were identified, though recurrence was somewhat more common among women with a history of two or fewer vaginal deliveries vs three or more (HR = 1.6; 95% confidence interval = 0.81-3.3). Recurrent POP following surgical management is common. Our ability to predict recurrence is limited.

Для цитирования: Fialkow Michael F, Newton Katherine M, Weiss Noel S. Incidence of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse 10 years following primary surgical management: a retrospective cohort study.. International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0678-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.