Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
Patient Preference Phenotypes for Post-operative Anticoagulation After Hip or Knee Replacement: A Cross-sectional Survey Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lenert Leslie A, Scherbakov D Dmitry, Shaoibi Azza, Neelon Brian, Reynolds Amy, Kernan Laura, Lambourne Carol A, Pellegrini Vincent D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Patients who receive hip or knee replacement surgery should be anticoagulated to prevent thrombosis-related events, such as pulmonary embolism. The Pulmonary Embolism Prevention after Hip and Knee Replacement (PEPPER) is a large pragmatic trial studying which anticoagulant (aspirin, warfarin, or rivaroxaban) is optimal. As an adjunct to this study, we examined the role of patients' preferences in the tailoring of therapy, focusing on identification of subgroups or preference phenotypes.
METHODS: We constructed a multimedia conjoint analysis (CA) survey based on anticoagulants' beneficial and adverse effects at the expected probabilities being studied in the PEPPER trial. We recruited 192 hip and knee post-surgery patients at the Medical University of South Carolina who were eligible for the PEPPER trial and were studied 1 to 7 months after surgery. K-means clustering was used to characterize heterogeneity in patients' preferences.
RESULTS: Across the studied population, expected risks of major adverse effects (bleeding, venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism) were, on average, rated as being of similar importance, with somewhat greater weight being placed on avoiding risks of pulmonary embolism. However, few patients had values near the average for the population, with patients grouping in three distinct, minimally overlapping segments or preference phenotypes: thrombosis-focused values (aligns with rivaroxaban treatment), balanced values (bleeding and thrombosis-focus (aligns with aspirin)), and out-of-pocket-cost focused values (aligns with aspirin or warfarin).
CONCLUSIONS: In the post-knee/post-hip replacement setting, a CA survey revealed that patients value the risks and benefits of anticoagulation differently, with three distinct preference phenotypes that have potential implications for individualizing therapy.
METHODS: We constructed a multimedia conjoint analysis (CA) survey based on anticoagulants' beneficial and adverse effects at the expected probabilities being studied in the PEPPER trial. We recruited 192 hip and knee post-surgery patients at the Medical University of South Carolina who were eligible for the PEPPER trial and were studied 1 to 7 months after surgery. K-means clustering was used to characterize heterogeneity in patients' preferences.
RESULTS: Across the studied population, expected risks of major adverse effects (bleeding, venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism) were, on average, rated as being of similar importance, with somewhat greater weight being placed on avoiding risks of pulmonary embolism. However, few patients had values near the average for the population, with patients grouping in three distinct, minimally overlapping segments or preference phenotypes: thrombosis-focused values (aligns with rivaroxaban treatment), balanced values (bleeding and thrombosis-focus (aligns with aspirin)), and out-of-pocket-cost focused values (aligns with aspirin or warfarin).
CONCLUSIONS: In the post-knee/post-hip replacement setting, a CA survey revealed that patients value the risks and benefits of anticoagulation differently, with three distinct preference phenotypes that have potential implications for individualizing therapy.