Current opinion in oncology · 2025
Monitoring serum estradiol in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer on adjuvant LHRH agonists.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Valenza Carmine, Etessami Julian D, Munzone Elisabetta, Pravettoni Gabriella, Curigliano Giuseppe, Trapani Dario
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the current evidence and inform clinical guidance on the implications of incomplete ovarian function suppression (OFS), the utility of serum estradiol (E2) monitoring, and appropriate management strategies in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving adjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa)-based therapy for OFS.
RECENT FINDINGS: A universally accepted definition of incomplete OFS is currently lacking. Although biologically it is plausible that incomplete OFS may compromise the efficacy of endocrine therapy, its actual impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Currently, the reliability of E2 monitoring is limited by considerable variability in assay methods and reference ranges, raising concerns about its analytical validity. Notably, in a recent international survey of 205 oncologists managing patients with eBC, 43% reported routinely and 27% occasionally assessing E2 levels in premenopausal patients treated with LHRHa, suggesting inconsistent clinical practice. Standard immunoassays were the most frequently used (65%). However, interpretation of E2 values and subsequent management decisions varied widely, highlighting the absence of standardized clinical guidelines.
SUMMARY: Although not currently supported by high-level evidence, serum E2 monitoring is widely adopted in clinical practice. Prospective studies and evidence-based recommendations are urgently needed. Emerging strategies to overcome incomplete OFS include LHRH antagonists (e.g., degarelix) and oral SERDs.
RECENT FINDINGS: A universally accepted definition of incomplete OFS is currently lacking. Although biologically it is plausible that incomplete OFS may compromise the efficacy of endocrine therapy, its actual impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Currently, the reliability of E2 monitoring is limited by considerable variability in assay methods and reference ranges, raising concerns about its analytical validity. Notably, in a recent international survey of 205 oncologists managing patients with eBC, 43% reported routinely and 27% occasionally assessing E2 levels in premenopausal patients treated with LHRHa, suggesting inconsistent clinical practice. Standard immunoassays were the most frequently used (65%). However, interpretation of E2 values and subsequent management decisions varied widely, highlighting the absence of standardized clinical guidelines.
SUMMARY: Although not currently supported by high-level evidence, serum E2 monitoring is widely adopted in clinical practice. Prospective studies and evidence-based recommendations are urgently needed. Emerging strategies to overcome incomplete OFS include LHRH antagonists (e.g., degarelix) and oral SERDs.