World journal of gastroenterology · 2005
Role of nuclear receptor CAR in carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamazaki Yuichi, Kakizaki Satoru, Horiguchi Norio, Takagi Hitoshi, Mori Masatomo, Negishi Masahiko
Аннотация
AIM: To investigate the precise roles of CAR in CCl(4)-induced acute hepatotoxicity.
METHODS: To prepare an acute liver injury model, CCl(4) was intraperitoneally injected in CAR+/+ and CAR-/- mice.
RESULTS: Elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase and extension of centrilobular necrosis were slightly inhibited in CAR-/- mice compared to CAR+/+ mice without PB. Administration of a CAR inducer, PB, revealed that CCl(4)-induced liver toxicity was partially inhibited in CAR-/- mice compared with CAR+/+ mice. On the other hand, androstanol, an inverse agonist ligand, inhibited hepatotoxicity in CAR+/+ but not in CAR-/- mice. Thus, CAR activation caused CCl(4) hepatotoxicity while CAR inhibition resulted in partial protection against CCl(4)-induced hepatotoxicity. There were no differences in the expression of CYP2E1, the main metabolizing enzyme for CCl(4), between CAR+/+ and CAR-/- mice. However, the expression of other CCl(4)-metabolizing enzymes, such as CYP2B10 and 3A11, was induced by PB in CAR+/+ but not in CAR-/- mice. Although the main pathway of CCl(4)-induced acute liver injury is mediated by CYP2E1, CAR modulates its pathway via induction of CYP2B10 and 3A11 in the presence of activator or inhibitor.
CONCLUSION: The nuclear receptor CAR modulates CCl(4)-induced liver injury via induction of CCl(4)-metabolizing enzymes in the presence of an activator. Our results suggest that drugs interacting with nuclear receptors such as PB might play critical roles in drug-induced liver injury or drug-drug interaction even though such drugs themselves are not hepatotoxic.
METHODS: To prepare an acute liver injury model, CCl(4) was intraperitoneally injected in CAR+/+ and CAR-/- mice.
RESULTS: Elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase and extension of centrilobular necrosis were slightly inhibited in CAR-/- mice compared to CAR+/+ mice without PB. Administration of a CAR inducer, PB, revealed that CCl(4)-induced liver toxicity was partially inhibited in CAR-/- mice compared with CAR+/+ mice. On the other hand, androstanol, an inverse agonist ligand, inhibited hepatotoxicity in CAR+/+ but not in CAR-/- mice. Thus, CAR activation caused CCl(4) hepatotoxicity while CAR inhibition resulted in partial protection against CCl(4)-induced hepatotoxicity. There were no differences in the expression of CYP2E1, the main metabolizing enzyme for CCl(4), between CAR+/+ and CAR-/- mice. However, the expression of other CCl(4)-metabolizing enzymes, such as CYP2B10 and 3A11, was induced by PB in CAR+/+ but not in CAR-/- mice. Although the main pathway of CCl(4)-induced acute liver injury is mediated by CYP2E1, CAR modulates its pathway via induction of CYP2B10 and 3A11 in the presence of activator or inhibitor.
CONCLUSION: The nuclear receptor CAR modulates CCl(4)-induced liver injury via induction of CCl(4)-metabolizing enzymes in the presence of an activator. Our results suggest that drugs interacting with nuclear receptors such as PB might play critical roles in drug-induced liver injury or drug-drug interaction even though such drugs themselves are not hepatotoxic.