European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
Surgical treatment of popliteomeniscal fascicles tears is associated with better patient-reported outcome measures. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Masoni Virginia, Giustra Fortunato, Bosco Francesco, Camarda Lawrence, Rovere Giuseppe, Sciannameo Veronica, Berchialla Paola, Massè Alessandro
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Popliteomeniscal fascicles (PMFs) are a component of the popliteal hiatus complex in the knee, and their injury primarily affects young athletes participating in sports activities involving twisting movements. The identification of PMFs tears presents a challenge, often accompanied by lateral pain and a locking sensation. The objective of this systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis is to enhance the suspicion and recognition of PMFs tears, aiming to facilitate the treatment of this condition, particularly in symptomatic young patients.
METHODS: A comprehensive search, focused on studies examining PMFs injuries and their treatment, was conducted in four databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. The ROBINS-I tool was used to evaluate the risks of bias. The PRISMA flow diagram was used to conduct the research and select the included studies. A meta-analysis was conducted for the Lysholm score, the Tegner Activity Scale, and the subjective IKDC score. The present SR and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO.
RESULTS: Five clinical studies were included in the final analysis, comprising 96 patients. All the patients underwent a preoperative MRI assessment and a diagnostic arthroscopy to detect the PMFs tears, with a subsequent surgical procedure either open or arthroscopically performed. Surgery was associated with the resolution of symptoms. A statistically significant improvement in the Lysholm score (p: 0.0005) and the subjective IKDC score (p: 0.003) after the surgical procedure with respect to the preoperative evaluation was found.
CONCLUSION: This SR and meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in the Lysholm score and subjective IKDC score following surgery for PMFs tears. However, controversy persists regarding the optimal surgical approach, with current literature favoring arthroscopic procedures.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
METHODS: A comprehensive search, focused on studies examining PMFs injuries and their treatment, was conducted in four databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. The ROBINS-I tool was used to evaluate the risks of bias. The PRISMA flow diagram was used to conduct the research and select the included studies. A meta-analysis was conducted for the Lysholm score, the Tegner Activity Scale, and the subjective IKDC score. The present SR and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO.
RESULTS: Five clinical studies were included in the final analysis, comprising 96 patients. All the patients underwent a preoperative MRI assessment and a diagnostic arthroscopy to detect the PMFs tears, with a subsequent surgical procedure either open or arthroscopically performed. Surgery was associated with the resolution of symptoms. A statistically significant improvement in the Lysholm score (p: 0.0005) and the subjective IKDC score (p: 0.003) after the surgical procedure with respect to the preoperative evaluation was found.
CONCLUSION: This SR and meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in the Lysholm score and subjective IKDC score following surgery for PMFs tears. However, controversy persists regarding the optimal surgical approach, with current literature favoring arthroscopic procedures.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.