MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4330/wjc.v18.i2.115528

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of cardiology · 2026

Efficacy of nitroglycerin vs labetalol in hypertensive emergency among patients with a history of coronary artery disease.

Chaudhary Ahmed Jamal, Bhat Wasim Akbar, Ul Haq Affan, Rashid Haroon Ur, Khan Irum Dad, Khan Mah Noor Dad, Nawaz Hafiz Muhammad Mubeen, Ali Sameer, Tariq Muhammad Hamza

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive emergencies, characterized by severe blood pressure elevation (> 180/120 mmHg) with end-organ damage, pose significant risks in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), where rapid yet safe reduction is crucial to prevent ischemia and complications. Nitroglycerin and labetalol are common intravenous agents, but comparative data in CAD are limited.

AIM: To compare efficacy and safety of nitroglycerin vs labetalol in hypertensive emergencies among CAD patients, assessing blood pressure control, reductions, adverse events, outcomes, and utilization.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of 563 CAD patients with hypertensive emergency (2018-2024) receiving IV nitroglycerin (n = 282) or labetalol (n = 281). Primary: Time to target blood pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 160 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg]. Secondary: Blood pressure reductions, major adverse cardiovascular event, safety, utilization. Analyzed via t-tests, χ 2, multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, myocardial infarction/heart failure history, diabetes, baseline SBP, chest pain.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were balanced. Labetalol achieved target blood pressure faster (25.14 ± 4.92 minutes vs 30.38 ± 5.16 minutes; P < 0.0001), but nitroglycerin yielded greater SBP (50.78 ± 9.45 mmHg vs 45.20 ± 10.46 mmHg; P < 0.0001) and diastolic blood pressure reductions (29.86 ± 8.63 mmHg vs 28.02 ± 7.74 mmHg; P = 0.0079). Nitroglycerin showed trends toward lower major adverse cardiovascular event [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-1.24], reduced bradycardia (AOR: 0.14; 95%CI: 0.05-0.38), shorter intensive care unit (2.99 ± 1.04 days vs 3.54 ± 1.02 days; P < 0.0001) and hospital stays (6.92 ± 1.93 days vs 7.99 ± 2.06 days; P < 0.0001), lower 30-day readmissions (AOR: 0.49; 95%CI: 0.27-0.88), and smaller biomarker increases (delta troponin: 0.10 ± 0.05 ng/mL vs 0.21 ± 0.10 ng/mL; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

While labetalol offers faster blood pressure control, nitroglycerin is associated with greater reductions, fewer adverse events like bradycardia, and improved utilization (shorter stays, fewer readmissions) in CAD-associated hypertensive emergencies, supporting its use in ischemic contexts.

Для цитирования: Chaudhary Ahmed Jamal, Bhat Wasim Akbar, Ul Haq Affan, Rashid Haroon Ur, Khan Irum Dad, Khan Mah Noor Dad, Nawaz Hafiz Muhammad Mubeen, Ali Sameer, Tariq Muhammad Hamza. Efficacy of nitroglycerin vs labetalol in hypertensive emergency among patients with a history of coronary artery disease.. World journal of cardiology. 2026. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i2.115528.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.