Airway obstruction due to unilateral vocal fold paralysis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Airway obstruction is an uncommon presentation of unilateral laryngeal paralysis. We have observed two mechanisms of obstruction: arytenoid prolapse and inappropriate adduction of the paralyzed vocal fold. We evaluated arytenoid abduction (AAb) and recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) reinnervation as treatments for airway obstruction in patients with unilateral laryngeal paralysis.
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective case series.
METHODS
Seven patients with airway obstruction secondary to unilateral laryngeal paralysis were evaluated with flexible laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy. Patients with flaccid paralysis and a prolapsing arytenoid were treated with AAb. Airway obstruction due to inspiratory vocal fold adduction was managed by RLN transection and ansa reinnervation of the distal stump.
RESULTS
In all cases, paralysis resulted from RLN injury during surgery: thyroidectomy or cervical spine surgery. AAb was performed in four patients with arytenoid prolapse, and all had significant airway improvement, including decannulation of the two patients who had been tracheotomy dependent. RLN reinnervation was performed in five patients, two of whom had inappropriate adduction detected after AAb. The site of RLN injury was identified at surgery in all four patients. Inspiratory stridor and laryngospasm were abolished immediately after RLN transection.
CONCLUSIONS
Arytenoid prolapse and/or inappropriate laryngeal adduction can cause airway obstruction in patients with unilateral laryngeal paralysis. Treatment of airway obstruction should address the underlying pathophysiology. AAb and RLN transection with ansa reinnervation can be effective in selected patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.