MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/2325967119892925

Медицинская библиотека · Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2020

Biomechanical Evaluation of Proximal Hamstring Repair: All-Suture Anchor Versus Titanium Suture Anchor.

Otto Alexander, DiCosmo Alyssa M, Baldino Joshua B, Mehl Julian, Obopilwe Elifho, Cote Mark P, Imhoff Andreas B, Beitzel Knut, Mazzocca Augustus D, Coyner Katherine

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Proximal hamstring avulsions are severe tendon injuries and are commonly sports-related. Open and endoscopic techniques as well as different anchor configurations have already been described for proximal hamstring repair. Novel all-suture anchors have been developed to provide decreased bone loss during placement and reduced occupied bone volume when compared with titanium suture anchors.

HYPOTHESIS: Complete proximal hamstring avulsions repaired with all-suture anchors will demonstrate equal load to failure and comparable displacement under cyclic loading when compared with titanium suture anchors.

STUDY

DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Complete proximal hamstring avulsions were created in 18 paired cadaveric specimens (mean ± SD age, 63.0 ± 10.4 years). Either all-suture anchors or titanium suture anchors were used for repair. Cyclic loading from 10 to 125 N at 1 Hz was performed for 1500 cycles with a material testing machine. Displacement was assessed along anterior and posterior aspects of the tendon repair with optical tracking. Specimens were loaded to failure at a rate of 120 mm/min. Displacement, load to failure, and repair construct stiffness were compared between matched pairs with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlations were determined by Spearman rho analysis.

RESULTS

The all-suture anchors showed significantly higher load-to-failure values when compared with the titanium anchor repairs (799.64 ± 257.1 vs 573.27 ± 89.9 N; P = .008). There was no significant difference in displacement between all-suture anchors and titanium suture anchors at the anterior aspect (6.60 ± 2.2 vs 5.49 ± 1.1 mm; P = .26) or posterior aspect (5.87 ± 2.08 vs 5.23 ± 1.37 mm; P = .678) of the repaired hamstring tendons.

CONCLUSION

All-suture anchors demonstrated similar displacement and superior load to failure when compared with titanium suture anchors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study suggest that all-suture anchors are an equivalent alternative to titanium suture anchors for proximal hamstring avulsion repair.

Для цитирования: Otto Alexander, DiCosmo Alyssa M, Baldino Joshua B, Mehl Julian, Obopilwe Elifho, Cote Mark P, Imhoff Andreas B, Beitzel Knut, Mazzocca Augustus D, Coyner Katherine. Biomechanical Evaluation of Proximal Hamstring Repair: All-Suture Anchor Versus Titanium Suture Anchor.. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119892925.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.