MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1088/2057-1976/ae6d02

Медицинская библиотека · Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2026

Deep learning-based intraluminal gas modeling for anatomically accurate synthetic CT in MRI-based radiation therapy.

Luna Braian Adair Maldonado, Rojas Gerardo Uriel Pérez, Pérez René Eduardo Rodríguez, Alonso Benito De Celis, Singhrao Kamal

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Purpose.Accurate modeling of intraluminal gas in synthetic computed tomography (sCT) is often compromised by the stochastic nature of bowel and rectal gas, which complicates magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/CT deformable image registration (DIR) and necessitates time-consuming manual corrections. Here, we propose a novel, DIR-free, two-stage deep learning framework designed to improve the definition of intraluminal gas in sCT. By circumventing registration-based errors, this method aims to streamline MRI-only simulation and enhance the dosimetric reliability of sCT images in MRI-based radiotherapy.Methods.sCT generation was implemented using a two-stage generative adversarial network (GAN) framework. In the first stage, a CycleGAN or pix2pix model converted MRI inputs into segmented map images (SMI); in the second stage, a conditional GAN (pix2pix) transformed the SMI into the final sCT. Ground-truth intraluminal gas cavities were defined in the following order: gastrointestinal contours were generated via CNN-based autosegmentation, manually verified, and subjected to a 20% intensity threshold. The framework was trained and validated using a publicly available 60-patient dataset. Performance was evaluated using the Dice-Sørensen coefficient for gas definition and mean absolute error (MAE) for global and tissue-specific Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy, comparing the two-stage framework against a direct single-stage MRI-to-sCT model. To evaluate dosimetric accuracy, prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy plans (36.25 Gy in 5 fractions) were optimized on five reference bulk-density sCT datasets and recalculated on both one-stage and two-stage sCT using a clinical treatment planning system.Results.The gas cavity Dice-Sørensen coefficient for the two-stage method and the single-stage method were 0.63 ± 0.11 and 0.04 ± 0.03 for pix2pix, while for CycleGAN, they were 0.67 ± 0.07 and 0.57 ± 0.11, respectively. The global MAE for the standard single-stage method and the two-stage method for pix2pix were 86 ± 20 HU and 94 ± 20 HU, while for CycleGAN, they were 105 ± 21 HU and 103 ± 22 HU, respectively. Dosimetric analysis demonstrated excellent agreement for the planning target volume (PTV D95%), with mean differences of 0.04 ± 0.08 cGy and -0.89 ± 1.98 cGy for the one-stage and two-stage models, respectively. Both models exhibited negligible deviations across all assessed organ-at-risk volumetric metrics, including D0.1cc, D1cc, and D15cc.Conclusions.The proposed two-stage framework significantly enhances the anatomical accuracy of intraluminal gas in sCT images, achieving a nearly threefold improvement in gas cavity definition over standard direct-conversion models. This method maintains high fidelity for bone and soft tissue while addressing a critical bottleneck in MRI-only simulation. Future studies will focus on the prospective evaluation of this framework to quantify its impact on dosimetric accuracy and treatment efficiency in online adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Для цитирования: Luna Braian Adair Maldonado, Rojas Gerardo Uriel Pérez, Pérez René Eduardo Rodríguez, Alonso Benito De Celis, Singhrao Kamal. Deep learning-based intraluminal gas modeling for anatomically accurate synthetic CT in MRI-based radiation therapy.. Biomedical physics & engineering express. 2026. DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ae6d02.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.