MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.019

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric surgery · 2011

Colorectal anomalies in patients with classic bladder exstrophy.

Stec Andrew A, Baradaran Nima, Tran Christine, Gearhart John P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: This study aims to determine the proportion and type of colorectal anomalies that occur in children born with classic bladder exstrophy (CBE).

METHODS

All patients in a database of 1044 patients with the bladder exstrophy-epispadias-cloacal exstrophy complex were reviewed. Those with CBE had their complete medical records reviewed. Children noted to have gastrointestinal malformations were identified, and all aspects of their history were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 676 patients were identified with CBE, of whom 12 patients were identified who had a concomitant colorectal anomaly. In this population, the proportion of colorectal anomalies is 1.8%. The most common gastrointestinal anomaly was imperforate anus in 8 patients. Two patients had severe rectal stenosis requiring serial dilations, and 2 patients were born with congenital rectal prolapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Excluding all variants and cloacal patients with exstrophy, isolated colorectal anomalies occur at a rate of 1.8% in children born with CBE, a 72-fold increase compared with the general population. Although uncommon in this rare birth defect, the morbidity is significant and warrants prompt evaluation and treatment of both the genitourinary and colorectal anomalies.

Для цитирования: Stec Andrew A, Baradaran Nima, Tran Christine, Gearhart John P. Colorectal anomalies in patients with classic bladder exstrophy.. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.019.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.