Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye · 2009
A comparative study of non-chopping rotation and axial rotation versus quick chop phacoemulsification techniques.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zeng Mingbing, Liu Xialin, Zhang Xinyu, Xia Yuanlin, Liu Yuhua, Yuan Zhaohui, Liu Yizhi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The authors describe the non-chopping rotation and axial rotation phacoemulsification techniques and compare them with the quick chop technique in terms of efficacy and safety.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, comparative study of 654 eyes of patients with cataracts who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation was conducted. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups according to phacoemulsification technique and were subdivided into four groups according to nuclear density.
RESULTS: For grade 1 and 2 nuclei, non-chopping rotation and axial rotation techniques outperformed the quick chop technique in ultrasound time, cumulative dissipated energy, best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, and endothelial cell loss. For grade 3 nuclei, the axial rotation technique did best according to the same terms. For grade 4 nuclei, the two rotation techniques were less efficient for lens removal.
CONCLUSION: The non-chopping rotation and axial rotation phacoemulsification techniques are advisable for removal of soft to medium-hard nuclei. For hard nuclei, chopping techniques are more successful.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, comparative study of 654 eyes of patients with cataracts who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation was conducted. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups according to phacoemulsification technique and were subdivided into four groups according to nuclear density.
RESULTS: For grade 1 and 2 nuclei, non-chopping rotation and axial rotation techniques outperformed the quick chop technique in ultrasound time, cumulative dissipated energy, best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, and endothelial cell loss. For grade 3 nuclei, the axial rotation technique did best according to the same terms. For grade 4 nuclei, the two rotation techniques were less efficient for lens removal.
CONCLUSION: The non-chopping rotation and axial rotation phacoemulsification techniques are advisable for removal of soft to medium-hard nuclei. For hard nuclei, chopping techniques are more successful.