MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7051

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2022

Uptake of Recommendations for Posttreatment Cancer-Related Fatigue Among Breast Cancer Survivors.

Di Meglio Antonio, Charles Cecile, Martin Elise, Havas Julie, Gbenou Arnauld, Flaysakier Jean-Daniel, Martin Anne-Laure, Everhard Sibille, Laas Enora, Chopin Nicolas, Vanlemmens Laurence, Jouannaud Christelle, Levy Christelle, Rigal Olivier, Fournier Marion, Soulie Patrick, Scotte Florian, Pistilli Barbara, Dumas Agnes, Menvielle Gwenn, André Fabrice, Michiels Stefan, Dauchy Sarah, Vaz-Luis Ines

Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Physical activity (PA) and psychosocial interventions are recommended management strategies for cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Randomized trials support the use of mind-body techniques, whereas no data show benefit for homeopathy or naturopathy.

METHODS

We used data from CANTO (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01993498), a multicenter, prospective study of stage I-III breast cancer (BC). CRF, evaluated after primary treatment completion using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (global CRF) and QLQ-FA12 (physical, emotional, and cognitive dimensions), served as the independent variable (severe [score of ≥40/100] vs nonsevere). Outcomes of interest were adherence to PA recommendations (≥10 metabolic equivalent of task [MET] h/week [GPAQ-16]) and participation in consultations with a psychologist, psychiatrist, acupuncturist, or other complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioner (homeopath and/or naturopath) after CRF assessment. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between CRF and outcomes, adjusting for sociodemographic, psychologic, tumor, and treatment characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 7,902 women diagnosed from 2012 through 2017, 36.4% reported severe global CRF, and 35.8%, 22.6%, and 14.1% reported severe physical, emotional, and cognitive CRF, respectively. Patients reporting severe global CRF were less likely to adhere to PA recommendations (60.4% vs 66.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.94; P=.004), and slightly more likely to see a psychologist (13.8% vs 7.5%; aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05-1.58; P=.014), psychiatrist (10.4% vs 5.0%; aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10-1.76; P=.0064), acupuncturist (9.8% vs 6.5%; aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.17-1.82; P=.0008), or CAM practitioner (12.5% vs 8.2%; aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.23-1.82; P<.0001). There were differences in recommendation uptake by CRF dimension, including that severe physical CRF was associated with lower adherence to PA (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86; P=.0001) and severe emotional CRF was associated with higher likelihood of psychologic consultations (aOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06-1.79; P=.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Uptake of recommendations to improve CRF, including adequate PA and use of psychosocial services, seemed suboptimal among patients with early-stage BC, whereas there was a nonnegligible interest in homeopathy and naturopathy. Findings of this large study indicate the need to implement recommendations for managing CRF in clinical practice.

Для цитирования: Di Meglio Antonio, Charles Cecile, Martin Elise, Havas Julie, Gbenou Arnauld, Flaysakier Jean-Daniel, Martin Anne-Laure, Everhard Sibille, Laas Enora, Chopin Nicolas, Vanlemmens Laurence, Jouannaud Christelle, Levy Christelle, Rigal Olivier, Fournier Marion, Soulie Patrick, Scotte Florian, Pistilli Barbara, Dumas Agnes, Menvielle Gwenn, André Fabrice, Michiels Stefan, Dauchy Sarah, Vaz-Luis Ines. Uptake of Recommendations for Posttreatment Cancer-Related Fatigue Among Breast Cancer Survivors.. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2022. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7051.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.