MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.015

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2020

Cervical-Thoracic Epidural Giant Cell Reparative Granuloma: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Hu Xianning, Yuan Tao, Lou Lei, Wang Yingjie, Liu Yawu, Quan Guanmin

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Giant cell reparative granuloma (GCRG) is a rare benign tumor. The jawbone is the most common site of occurrence, followed by sphenoid bone, craniofacial bone, hand and foot bones. The etiology of GCRG is unknown but may be related to an intraosseous hemorrhage following trauma. Despite its benign nature, it could be locally aggressive. To our knowledge, no spinal epidural GCRG case has been reported.

CASE DESCRIPTION: A case of man aged 32 years who presented with upper right limb numbness and weakness. Computed tomography showed a round soft tissue mass in the spinal canal at the C7-T1 level. The mass showed isointensity on T1-weighted images, hypointensity on T2-weighted images, and significant enhancement on postcontrast T1-weighted images. The mass localized in the epidural space and was surgically resected. The histologic diagnosis was consistent with GCRG.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal epidural GCRG is rare and is hardly considered in the differential diagnosis. Preoperative diagnosis of GCRG is challenging, and the definitive diagnosis could only be made by pathological examination. Surgical resection is probably an effective therapy for relief of symptoms.

Для цитирования: Hu Xianning, Yuan Tao, Lou Lei, Wang Yingjie, Liu Yawu, Quan Guanmin. Cervical-Thoracic Epidural Giant Cell Reparative Granuloma: Case Report and Review of the Literature.. World neurosurgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.