Pseudo-pulseless electrical activity in the emergency department, an evidence based approach.

INTRODUCTION

A great deal of the literature has focused specifically on true pulseless electrical activity (PEA), whereas there is a dearth of research regarding pseudo-PEA. This narrative review evaluates the diagnosis and management of patients in pseudo-PEA and discusses the impact on emerging patient outcomes.

DISCUSSION: Pseudo-PEA can be defined as evidence of cardiac activity without a detectable pulse. Distinguishing pseudo-PEA from true PEA is important for emergency physicians as the prognosis and management of these patients differ. POCUS is the tool most commonly used to diagnose pseudo-PEA and there are varying treatment strategies to manage these patients. Identifying patients in pseudo-PEA can help guide resuscitation decisions, and ultimately impact emergency response systems, patients, and families.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of pseudo-PEA is increasing. Effective care of these patients begins with early diagnosis of this condition and immediate treatment to warrant the greatest chance of survival. There is a need for further prospective studies surrounding pseudo-PEA as evidenced by the lack of research in the current literature.