Current problems in cancer · 2026
Spatial transcriptomics of primary and metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC reveals site-specific adaptations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khatoon Warisa, Yadav Kaustar, Katiyar Amit, Kumar Sunil, Arava Sudheer, Mohan Anant, Pandey Rambha, Sh Chandrashekhara, Nambirajan Aruna, Malik Prabhat Singh, Jain Deepali
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Genetic alterations and the tumor microenvironment (TME) influence treatment response in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC). This study maps site-specific TME adaptations and exploratory risk-associated signatures in lymph node metastases (LNT) to investigate metastatic evolution.
METHOD: We applied spatial transcriptomics to profile tumor (PanCK+) and stromal (PanCK-) compartments in a pilot cohort of 16 cases: primary lung tumors (LT, n = 3), LNT (n = 10), and brain metastases (BT, n = 3), with three site-matched non-tumor controls. LNT-derived prognostic signatures were evaluated using The Cancer Genome Atlas-Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA LUAD) cohorts.
RESULTS: Distinct, site-specific TME features were observed. LNT stroma was enriched in fibroblasts and macrophages, while tumor segments showed increased neutrophils. BT exhibited a macrophage-associated immunosuppressive TME. Tumor cells evolved divergently: LT retained pulmonary identity and showed trend towards translation-associated programs, LNT cells shifted toward senescence and epigenetic remodeling, and BT cells showed activation of Class A/1 (Rhodopsin-like) receptor, GPCR and drug metabolism pathways. In LNT, exploratory risk-associated differences were observed. Low-risk cases (n = 6) showed adaptive immune signatures, whereas high-risk cases (n = 4) showed enrichment for stromal MET signaling and stress-response pathways. Because treatment exposure differed markedly between the risk groups, these observations should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. TCGA LUAD analysis suggested the broader biological relevance of immune-associated markers, but reflected general LUAD rather than ALK+ specific biology. Discordant associations for GCLC and TIMP1 underscored the importance of spatial context.
CONCLUSION: Site-specific microenvironments may influence tumor adaptation across metastatic niches in ALK+ NSCLC. The exploratory risk-associated findings require validation in larger, uniformly treated cohorts.
METHOD: We applied spatial transcriptomics to profile tumor (PanCK+) and stromal (PanCK-) compartments in a pilot cohort of 16 cases: primary lung tumors (LT, n = 3), LNT (n = 10), and brain metastases (BT, n = 3), with three site-matched non-tumor controls. LNT-derived prognostic signatures were evaluated using The Cancer Genome Atlas-Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA LUAD) cohorts.
RESULTS: Distinct, site-specific TME features were observed. LNT stroma was enriched in fibroblasts and macrophages, while tumor segments showed increased neutrophils. BT exhibited a macrophage-associated immunosuppressive TME. Tumor cells evolved divergently: LT retained pulmonary identity and showed trend towards translation-associated programs, LNT cells shifted toward senescence and epigenetic remodeling, and BT cells showed activation of Class A/1 (Rhodopsin-like) receptor, GPCR and drug metabolism pathways. In LNT, exploratory risk-associated differences were observed. Low-risk cases (n = 6) showed adaptive immune signatures, whereas high-risk cases (n = 4) showed enrichment for stromal MET signaling and stress-response pathways. Because treatment exposure differed markedly between the risk groups, these observations should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. TCGA LUAD analysis suggested the broader biological relevance of immune-associated markers, but reflected general LUAD rather than ALK+ specific biology. Discordant associations for GCLC and TIMP1 underscored the importance of spatial context.
CONCLUSION: Site-specific microenvironments may influence tumor adaptation across metastatic niches in ALK+ NSCLC. The exploratory risk-associated findings require validation in larger, uniformly treated cohorts.