Saudi medical journal · 2025
Characterization and management of pain across phases of intraosseous infusion in emergency department patients with non-cardiac arrest.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shi Aiping, Chen Juan, He Xiaowei, Chen Chunyan, Sun Ming, Li Wei, Xu Wenxia, Yang Wei, Han Xiaoqin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for moderate-to-severe pain during intraosseous infusion (IOI) in non-cardiac arrest patients in the emergency department (ED). Secondary aims include evaluating pain trajectory across procedural stages and assessing the efficacy of a personalized pain management strategy.
METHODS: This mixed-methods study analyzed 220 ED patients undergoing IOI (150 retrospective, 70 prospective). The prospective cohort was randomized to standard care (n=35) or personalized pain management (n=35). Pain was quantified using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and critical-care pain observation tool (CPOT).
RESULTS: During puncture, 35.33% (53/150) reported no/mild pain. Pain severity peaked during flushing, with 73.33% (110/150) experiencing moderate/severe pain. At 15-minute infusion, this decreased to 57.33% (86). Univariate analysis identified gender and BMI as pain-associated factors (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed female gender (OR=13.468) and low BMI (OR=7.250) as independent risk factors (p<0.05). Compared to the control group, the personalized strategy group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores during puncture, flushing, and early infusion, with reduced analgesic requirements in the first 2 stages. No between-group differences occurred in puncture success or complication rates.
CONCLUSION: Intraosseous infusion flushing induces the most severe pain, particularly among females and low-BMI patients. Personalized, stage-targeted analgesia significantly improves pain control without compromising safety, supporting its integration into emergency IOI protocols.
METHODS: This mixed-methods study analyzed 220 ED patients undergoing IOI (150 retrospective, 70 prospective). The prospective cohort was randomized to standard care (n=35) or personalized pain management (n=35). Pain was quantified using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and critical-care pain observation tool (CPOT).
RESULTS: During puncture, 35.33% (53/150) reported no/mild pain. Pain severity peaked during flushing, with 73.33% (110/150) experiencing moderate/severe pain. At 15-minute infusion, this decreased to 57.33% (86). Univariate analysis identified gender and BMI as pain-associated factors (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed female gender (OR=13.468) and low BMI (OR=7.250) as independent risk factors (p<0.05). Compared to the control group, the personalized strategy group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores during puncture, flushing, and early infusion, with reduced analgesic requirements in the first 2 stages. No between-group differences occurred in puncture success or complication rates.
CONCLUSION: Intraosseous infusion flushing induces the most severe pain, particularly among females and low-BMI patients. Personalized, stage-targeted analgesia significantly improves pain control without compromising safety, supporting its integration into emergency IOI protocols.