Thorax · 2025
129Xe-MRI ventilation and acinar abnormalities highlight the significance of spirometric dysanapsis: findings from the NOVELTY ADPro UK substudy.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smith Laurie J, Marshall Helen, Jakymelen Demi, Biancardi Alberto, Collier Guilhem J, Chan Ho-Fung, Hughes Paul J C, Brook Martin L, Astley Josh R, Munro Ryan, Rajaram Smitha, Swift Andrew J, Capener David, Bray Jody, Ball Jimmy E, Rodgers Oliver, Tahir Bilal A, Rao Madhwesha, Norquay Graham, Weatherley Nicholas D, Armstrong Leanne, Hardaker Latife, Papi Alberto, Hughes Rod, Wild Jim M
Аннотация
RATIONALE: Airways dysanapsis is defined by CT or spirometry as a mismatch between the size of the airways and lung volume and is associated with increased risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Lung disease in participants with dysanapsis and a label of asthma and/or COPD remains poorly understood.
METHODS: In participants with asthma and/or COPD, we used 129Xe-MRI to assess ventilation, acinar dimensions and gas exchange, and pulmonary function tests, and compared people with spirometric dysanapsis (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<-1.64 z and FEV1>-1.64 z) to those with normal spirometry (FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC>-1.64 z).
RESULTS: From 165 participants assessed in the NOVELTY (NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY) ADPro (advanced diagnostic profiling) study with a physician-assigned diagnosis of asthma and/or COPD, 43 had spirometric dysanapsis and were age-matched to 43 participants with normal spirometry. Participants with dysanapsis had significantly increased ventilation defects (median difference (md) (95% CI) = 4.0% (1.42% to 5.38%), p<0.001), ventilation heterogeneity (md (95% CI) = 2.56% (1.31% to 3.56%), p<0.001) and measures of acinar dimensions (md (95% CI) = 0.004 cm2.s-1 (0.0009 to 0.007), p=0.009) from 129Xe-MRI, than those with normal spirometry. At the 1-year follow-up, only participants with dysanapsis had a significant increase in ventilation defects (md (95% CI)=0.45% (0.09% to 2.1%),p=0.016). Lower FEV1/FVC in the dysanapsis cohort was associated with increased ventilation defects (r=-0.64, R2=0.41, p<0.001) and increased acinar dimensions (r=-0.52, R2=0.38, p<0.001), with the highest values seen in those with an FVC above the upper limit of normal.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants with asthma and/or COPD, presenting to primary care with spirometric dysanapsis, exhibited increased lung abnormalities on 129Xe-MRI, when compared with those with normal spirometry. Spirometric dysanapsis in asthma and/or COPD is therefore associated with significant lung disease, and the FEV1/FVC is related to the degree of airways abnormality on 129Xe-MRI.
METHODS: In participants with asthma and/or COPD, we used 129Xe-MRI to assess ventilation, acinar dimensions and gas exchange, and pulmonary function tests, and compared people with spirometric dysanapsis (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<-1.64 z and FEV1>-1.64 z) to those with normal spirometry (FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC>-1.64 z).
RESULTS: From 165 participants assessed in the NOVELTY (NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY) ADPro (advanced diagnostic profiling) study with a physician-assigned diagnosis of asthma and/or COPD, 43 had spirometric dysanapsis and were age-matched to 43 participants with normal spirometry. Participants with dysanapsis had significantly increased ventilation defects (median difference (md) (95% CI) = 4.0% (1.42% to 5.38%), p<0.001), ventilation heterogeneity (md (95% CI) = 2.56% (1.31% to 3.56%), p<0.001) and measures of acinar dimensions (md (95% CI) = 0.004 cm2.s-1 (0.0009 to 0.007), p=0.009) from 129Xe-MRI, than those with normal spirometry. At the 1-year follow-up, only participants with dysanapsis had a significant increase in ventilation defects (md (95% CI)=0.45% (0.09% to 2.1%),p=0.016). Lower FEV1/FVC in the dysanapsis cohort was associated with increased ventilation defects (r=-0.64, R2=0.41, p<0.001) and increased acinar dimensions (r=-0.52, R2=0.38, p<0.001), with the highest values seen in those with an FVC above the upper limit of normal.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants with asthma and/or COPD, presenting to primary care with spirometric dysanapsis, exhibited increased lung abnormalities on 129Xe-MRI, when compared with those with normal spirometry. Spirometric dysanapsis in asthma and/or COPD is therefore associated with significant lung disease, and the FEV1/FVC is related to the degree of airways abnormality on 129Xe-MRI.