Model-Assisted Spleen Contouring for Assessing Splenomegaly in Myelofibrosis: A Fast and Reproducible Approach to Evaluate Progression and Treatment Response.
Аннотация
Background/
Objectives
Accurate and reproducible spleen volume measurements are essential for assessing treatment response and disease progression in myelofibrosis. This study evaluates techniques for measuring spleen volume on abdominal MRI.
Methods
In 20 patients with bone marrow biopsy-proven myelofibrosis, 5 observers independently measured spleen volume on 3 abdominal MRI pulse sequences, 3D-spoiled gradient echo T1, axial single-shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) T2, and coronal SSFSE T2, using ellipsoidal approximation, manual contouring, and 3D nnU-Net model-assisted contouring comparing coefficients of variation. Changes in spleen volume were compared to all information to assess which measurement technique tracked disease progression with the greatest accuracy.
Results
The coefficient of variation in spleen volume measurements averaging over 3 sequences was significantly lower for model-assisted contouring, 1.6% and manual contouring, 3.5%, compared to ellipsoidal estimation from 3 dimensions measured on axial and coronal T2 images, 15, p < 0.001. In 4 subjects with divergent treatment response predictions, model-assisted contouring was consistent with all information while ellipsoidal estimation was not. Manual contouring tracked similarly to model-assisted contouring but required more operator time.
Conclusions
Model-assisted segmentations provide efficient and more reproducible spleen volume measurements compared to estimates of spleen volume from ellipsoidal approximations and improve objective determinations of clinical trial enrollment eligibility based upon spleen volume as well as assessments of treatment response.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.