Introducing Cloacagram in Israel: Advancing Anatomical Assessment and Surgical Planning for Cloacal Malformations.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Cloacal malformation represents the rarest and most complex congenital anorectal malformation in females and is characterized by the convergence of urinary, gynecological, and intestinal systems within a single common channel. Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction (3D CT cloacagram) has emerged as a valuable method for anatomical assessment and preoperative planning.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate our experience with 3D CT cloacagram and assess its results.
METHODS
This retrospective case series included all patients with cloacal malformation who underwent preoperative 3D CT cloacagram at a single institution during 2019-2023. Collected data included patient characteristics, timing of the 3D CT cloacagram, results of the 3D CT cloacagram, comparison with endoscopic results, surgical procedures, and postoperative outcome.
RESULTS
Six patients with cloacal malformation were included in this study, including two with posterior cloaca. The median common channel length on 3D CT cloacagram was 24.5 mm (range 9-48 mm) and the median urethral length was 15.5 mm (range 13-24 mm). The surgical approach involved a combined abdominoperineal approach in three patients and posterior sagittal anorectal vaginal urethral plasty in one patient. Two patients were awaiting surgical reconstruction at the time of publication.
CONCLUSIONS
Our implementation of 3D cloacagram has facilitated precise measurements of both the urethra and common channel lengths, two key factors in formulating surgical strategies for cloacal reconstruction. Moreover, this technique has markedly improved our capacity for surgical planning contributing to colorectal, gynecological, and urological perspectives.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.