European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2011
Acute ankle sprain: is there a best support?
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
O'connor Gabrielle, Martin Anthony J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Acute lateral ankle sprain accounts for 85% of all sprains, being generally accepted as the most common sports-related ligamentous injury. There is a lack of consensus about the optimal management of these injuries despite their frequency. The time-honoured mantra of rest, ice, elevation and compression is still commonly used, even though the current evidence for compression is conflicting.
METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was carried out in the emergency department of a regional hospital in Ireland to compare outcomes, in terms of ankle function, pain improvement and return-to-work times, in adults presenting within 24 h of first-time acute lateral ankle sprain, among three external supports.
RESULTS: We found no statistically significant differences among all three treatments in terms of ankle joint function, using the Karlsson ankle function scale, at 10 or 30-days follow-up. There was a tendency for Elastoplast bandaging to provide better average ankle function at both time points, when compared with double tubigrip and no support. Participants returned to work an average 2 days earlier, if treated with Elastoplast.
CONCLUSION: This study found no statistically significant difference in ankle function between double tubigrip bandage, Elastoplast bandage and no support at 10 or 30-days follow-up.
METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was carried out in the emergency department of a regional hospital in Ireland to compare outcomes, in terms of ankle function, pain improvement and return-to-work times, in adults presenting within 24 h of first-time acute lateral ankle sprain, among three external supports.
RESULTS: We found no statistically significant differences among all three treatments in terms of ankle joint function, using the Karlsson ankle function scale, at 10 or 30-days follow-up. There was a tendency for Elastoplast bandaging to provide better average ankle function at both time points, when compared with double tubigrip and no support. Participants returned to work an average 2 days earlier, if treated with Elastoplast.
CONCLUSION: This study found no statistically significant difference in ankle function between double tubigrip bandage, Elastoplast bandage and no support at 10 or 30-days follow-up.