Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2015
Current surgical management of macroglossia.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Klosterman Tristan, Tatum Sherard A
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the current surgical management of macroglossia.
RECENT FINDINGS: Traditional surgical management of severe macroglossia has been with anterior wedge or keyhole resection. Long-term follow-up has been limited, and only recently have assessments been done regarding functional and aesthetic outcomes. New methods including double stellate and combination approaches have shown promise, though with limited case size reports. Addressing macroglossia in three dimensions may be the most effective way of achieving positive positional, speech and aesthetic outcomes, but comparative studies are lacking. Other causes of macroglossia, such as vascular malformations, can be managed with less aggressive measures such as laser and radio-frequency ablation.
SUMMARY: The aggressiveness of the management should match the severity of the symptoms. The anterior wedge resection and modified keyhole incisions are the most well studied operative strategies. Short and long-term outcome data are limited, and neither method is definitively superior. Less aggressive measures are options for less severe macroglossia. Surgical management of macroglossia should be tailored to each individual patient and in accordance to surgeon experience and expertise.
RECENT FINDINGS: Traditional surgical management of severe macroglossia has been with anterior wedge or keyhole resection. Long-term follow-up has been limited, and only recently have assessments been done regarding functional and aesthetic outcomes. New methods including double stellate and combination approaches have shown promise, though with limited case size reports. Addressing macroglossia in three dimensions may be the most effective way of achieving positive positional, speech and aesthetic outcomes, but comparative studies are lacking. Other causes of macroglossia, such as vascular malformations, can be managed with less aggressive measures such as laser and radio-frequency ablation.
SUMMARY: The aggressiveness of the management should match the severity of the symptoms. The anterior wedge resection and modified keyhole incisions are the most well studied operative strategies. Short and long-term outcome data are limited, and neither method is definitively superior. Less aggressive measures are options for less severe macroglossia. Surgical management of macroglossia should be tailored to each individual patient and in accordance to surgeon experience and expertise.