The kinematics of 1-on-1 rugby tackling: a study using 3-dimensional motion analysis.

BACKGROUND

Although past studies using video analysis indicated that the arm tackle and head-in-front shoulder tackle are possible risks for shoulder dislocation, the underlying mechanisms of tackling-related shoulder dislocation have not been sufficiently investigated. This study aimed to analyze the kinematic aspects of these tackling motions in 1-on-1 tackles in an experimental setting using a 3-dimensional motion-capture system.

METHODS

A total of 65 one-on-one tackles were recorded using a marker-based, automatic, digitizing motion-capture system. A documented tackle was classified into 1 of 3 types, which was decided based on the first point of contact on the ball carrier and the head position at the time of impact: shoulder tackle (reference tackle), arm tackle, and head-in-front tackle. The orientations of the head, trunk, and shoulder at impact were calculated and statistically compared with each other.

RESULTS

The distribution of tackles recorded in this study was as follows: 38 shoulder, 23 arm, and 4 head-in-front tackles. In comparison with the shoulder tackle as a reference, shoulder abduction on the side of impact was higher in both the arm and head-in-front tackles, while shoulder external rotation was lower in the head-in-front tackles. In the latter type of tackle, significant decreases in neck extension and ipsilateral neck rotation were also indicated.

CONCLUSION

The kinematics in both the arm tackle and the head-in-front tackle is significantly different from that in the shoulder tackle and may represent a distinct risk factor for shoulder dislocation.