MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090230

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2025

Real-world effectiveness and safety of oral azvudine versus Paxlovid in patients with COVID-19 and pre-existing hypertension: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study in Henan Province, China.

Wang Fuwei, Jia Bohan, Li Guotao, Jin Xiaoli, Yang Mengzhao, Li Guangming, Zhang Shixi, Qian Guowu, Luo Hong, Cheng Ming, Wang Ling, Zhang Donghua, Li Silin, Liang Hongxia, Ren Zhigang

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Azvudine and Paxlovid are the primary antiviral agents for the management of COVID-19. However, there is currently insufficient evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of these drugs in treating COVID-19 patients with pre-existing hypertension. The objective of this study was to assess their effectiveness and safety among those patients in a real-world context.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Electronic medical record data of COVID-19 patients with pre-existing hypertension were extracted from nine hospitals in Henan Province from 5 December 2022 to 31 January 2023.

PARTICIPANTS

Following 2:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 996 individuals who received treatment with azvudine and 498 individuals who received treatment with Paxlovid were included in the analysis.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was all-cause death and the secondary outcome was the composite disease progression.

RESULTS

Following adherence to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and 2:1 PSM, 996 individuals were included in the azvudine group and 498 in the Paxlovid group. The Cox regression analysis revealed that the azvudine group had a significantly lower risk of all-cause death compared with the Paxlovid group (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.455 to 0.911, p=0.013). However, there was no statistically significant difference in composite disease progression between the two groups (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.711 to 1.229, p=0.629). Subgroup analysis indicated that, compared with Paxlovid, patients with moderate disease receiving azvudine treatment exhibited a significantly reduced risk of composite disease progression (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.89). The safety analysis showed that the azvudine group had fewer adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Among COVID-19 patients with pre-existing hypertension, the effectiveness of azvudine is not inferior to Paxlovid in reducing all-cause death and composite disease progression, with fewer adverse events.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06349655.

Для цитирования: Wang Fuwei, Jia Bohan, Li Guotao, Jin Xiaoli, Yang Mengzhao, Li Guangming, Zhang Shixi, Qian Guowu, Luo Hong, Cheng Ming, Wang Ling, Zhang Donghua, Li Silin, Liang Hongxia, Ren Zhigang. Real-world effectiveness and safety of oral azvudine versus Paxlovid in patients with COVID-19 and pre-existing hypertension: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study in Henan Province, China.. BMJ open. 2025. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090230.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.