Journal of pediatric surgery · 2008
Prognostic implications of bile lakes after surgery for biliary atresia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Inoue Yumi, Kato Yoshifumi, Tamura Tsuyoshi, Kobayashi Hiroyuki, Ichikawa Satoko, Lane Geoffrey J, Yamataka Atsuyuki
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to establish the natural history of bile lakes (BLs) in patients with postportoenterostomy biliary atresia (BA) and assess their prognostic implications, in particular, if they are a risk factor for cholangitis.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-one postsurgical BA patients were divided into 2 groups as follows: period 1, or preliver transplantation era group (n = 56), and period 2, or liver transplantation era group (n = 65). Presence of BL and outcome were examined in relation to the incidence of cholangitis.
RESULTS: In period 1, there were more multiple BLs (MBLs) in nonsurvivors than survivors. Non-BL survivors had significantly lower mean total number of episodes of cholangitis than MBL survivors (P < .01). In period 2, 58 survived (native liver in 35; transplanted liver in 23). Bile lakes were present in 9/58 (16%) survivors (single in five, multiple BLs in four), and 1/7 (14%) nonsurvivors had MBLs. Mean total number of episodes of cholangitis in the 4 MBL survivors and the 49 non-BL survivors were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that presence of BL is a risk factor for cholangitis in the long-term but not in the short-term.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-one postsurgical BA patients were divided into 2 groups as follows: period 1, or preliver transplantation era group (n = 56), and period 2, or liver transplantation era group (n = 65). Presence of BL and outcome were examined in relation to the incidence of cholangitis.
RESULTS: In period 1, there were more multiple BLs (MBLs) in nonsurvivors than survivors. Non-BL survivors had significantly lower mean total number of episodes of cholangitis than MBL survivors (P < .01). In period 2, 58 survived (native liver in 35; transplanted liver in 23). Bile lakes were present in 9/58 (16%) survivors (single in five, multiple BLs in four), and 1/7 (14%) nonsurvivors had MBLs. Mean total number of episodes of cholangitis in the 4 MBL survivors and the 49 non-BL survivors were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that presence of BL is a risk factor for cholangitis in the long-term but not in the short-term.