MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s001130050316

Медицинская библиотека · Der Unfallchirurg · 1998

[Intramedullary boring in infected intramedullary nail osteosyntheses of the tibia and femur].

Pommer A, Dávid A, Richter J, Muhr G

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: The infection after intramedullary nailing is a severe complication, which is hard to eradicate. The results of reaming the intramedullary canal after removal of the infected nail were evaluated in our investigation. From 1984 to 1991 fifty-five patients with infected intramedullary nails of the lower extremity were included in this trial. Twenty-one patients had an infection of the femur. Thirty-four patients had a primary infection of the nail, twenty-one patients had multiple operations with periods of infection prior to nailing. All patients had signs of a chronic osteitis and sinus formation. At the time of the follow-up the success of the procedure was evaluated regarding recurrence of infection, range of motion of the extremity and patient comfort. The mean time of observation was 10.1 +/- 4.9 years. All patients with initially infected intramedullary nails had no recurrence of the infection, compared to 62% of those with multiple operations prior to nailing. At the time of the follow up all fractures had healed. 85% of the patients performed full weight bearing. 32 patients (91%) had good or excellent ROM of the adjacent joints.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary reaming after infected nails is a successful procedure and results in infect healing in the majority of patients.

Для цитирования: Pommer A, Dávid A, Richter J, Muhr G. [Intramedullary boring in infected intramedullary nail osteosyntheses of the tibia and femur].. Der Unfallchirurg. 1998. DOI: 10.1007/s001130050316.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.