[Posterior IVS: feasibility and preliminary results in a continuous series of 108 cases].

OBJECTIVE

We present a continuous series of 108 patients operated for genital prolapse by vaginal route using the Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty (PIVS) technique (IVS 02 Tyco Healthcare, polypropylene multifilament band), associated to prosthetic repair of cystocele and/or rectocele if present by interposition of a mesh (Surgipro Mesh Tyco Healthcare).

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were C and/or D point superior to -1 cm. The main criterion is the assessment of feasibility, morbidity and anatomical results obtained for the treatment of level 1 genital prolapse with an average follow-up of 19 months. The secondary criterion is to assess the same elements for the treatment of associated cystocele and rectocele.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients presented with a cystocele (Ba>-1 cm) and eighty-seven with a rectocele (Bp>-1 cm). Nineteen patients had a hysterectomy, twenty had amputation of the cervix and forty-nine were treated for stress urinary incontinence by anterior IVS. Perioperative complications consisted of seven bladder injuries, one injury to the lower rectum during dissection. Postoperative complications were: a loss more than 2 g haemoglobin for seven patients, two haematomas in the cave of Retzius, one haematoma of the pararectal fossa with secondary superinfection requiring mesh removal. Three erosions occurred: two in front of the vesicovaginal prosthesis and one in front of the recto-vaginal prosthesis. The latter became secondarily super infected and had to be removed. With regard to the anatomical result, one failure was noted for the Posterior IVS excluding the two patients in whom the prosthetic material had to be removed. For the anterior compartment, eight failures occurred. From a functional perspective, we noted one case of dyspareunia due to fibrous retraction and seven patients complained of de novo stress urinary incontinence and eight of moderate voiding obstruction.

DISCUSSION AND

CONCLUSIONS

The technical feasibility is excellent. Feasibility of level 2 repair, anterior or posterior, but results on cystocele are insufficient in case of lateral defect.