MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.18787/jr.2023.00076

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society · 2024

Two Cases of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea Repair Surgery Using TachoComb.

Bae Ah Young, Kim Sun Hong, Hwang Se Hwan

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea is a rare condition characterized by the leakage of CSF through the nose. The diagnosis is established through comprehensive history taking, brain imaging, and nasal endoscopy. Surgical intervention is considered a secondary option for CSF leakage when conservative treatments, including behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, or lumbar puncture, fail to elicit a response. In recent years, endoscopic intranasal surgery has been favored over craniotomy for such surgical treatment. When repairing CSF leakage defects via endoscopic intranasal surgery, autologous fat and muscle flaps are commonly employed. However, these grafts may lead to complications, including donor site infection, edema, and wound dehiscence. Therefore, in this article, we would like to introduce two cases of CSF rhinorrhea repair surgery using TachoComb. While previous studies have employed TachoComb as a supplementary material for the repair of CSF leak defects, in the cases we describe, the primary reconstruction of the defect area was achieved using TachoComb, supported by free grafts such as septal bone or turbinate mucosal flap, which were smaller than the size of the CSF leakage defects.

Для цитирования: Bae Ah Young, Kim Sun Hong, Hwang Se Hwan. Two Cases of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea Repair Surgery Using TachoComb.. Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society. 2024. DOI: 10.18787/jr.2023.00076.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.