MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/yco.0000000000000621

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in psychiatry · 2020

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa): worldwide issues.

Ramanathan Surash, McCurdy Christopher R

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To inform readers about the increasingly popular Western dietary supplement, kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) and how the products are available in the Western world compared with traditional Southeast Asian use. Kratom has been traditionally used for increasing stamina of outdoor laborers (farmers), mood enhancement, pain, and opium addiction. Interestingly, kratom has been reported to have a paradoxical effect in that stimulant feelings, and sedative feelings can be obtained depending on the amount utilized. There are several biologically active alkaloids present in kratom.

RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have been focused on the interactions of mitragynine, the most abundant alkaloid, and opioid-like effects. This has been driven by the harm that kratom products have produced in the Western world, in stark contrast to the lack of harm in Southeast Asian traditional use over centuries. Many users in the Western world ingest kratom for mood enhancement and/or to ween themselves from prescription or illicit opioids. Highly concentrated products and recreational use and misuse have resulted in individuals pushing doses to levels that have not been imagined or ever studied in animal, let alone humans.

SUMMARY: Kratom, as a preparation and how it is utilized is different around the world.

Для цитирования: Ramanathan Surash, McCurdy Christopher R. Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa): worldwide issues.. Current opinion in psychiatry. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000621.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.