Environmental and occupational health practice · 2026
Occupational health services in Thailand: system, regulation, and the role of overseas health checkup initiatives.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Poonkla Ueampohn, Rattanawitoon Thanawat, J-P Naw Awn, Siriruttanapruk Somkiat
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Occupational health services (OHS) are essential components of public health systems, aiming to prevent work-related diseases, promote safe working environments, and protect workers' health. Although OHS have been implemented in Thailand, the incidence of occupational health-related fatalities remains high. This study aimed to assess the current status of occupational health service provision for both domestic and migrant workers in Thailand, including the relevant regulatory frameworks and policy arrangements.
METHODS: A narrative policy and systems review was conducted in 2025 to examine the provision of occupational health services in Thailand, the national healthcare system, and relevant laws, policies, and regulations.
RESULTS: The study revealed that Thailand has legislation mandating health examinations for domestically employed workers exposed to occupational risk factors, regulated by the Ministry of Labour, alongside standards for healthcare facilities delivering occupational health services established by the Ministry of Public Health. However, significant gaps remain, particularly in data integration and, importantly, the absence of a comprehensive occupational health care framework for Thai workers employed overseas.
CONCLUSION: Strengthening policy coherence between the Ministry of Labour and the Ministry of Public Health, together with the establishment of a national occupational safety and health institute, is recommended to support the sustainable development of occupational health services. In addition, international initiatives such as health checkup programs for Thai overseas workers provide a valuable platform for cross-border occupational health surveillance and continuity of care.
METHODS: A narrative policy and systems review was conducted in 2025 to examine the provision of occupational health services in Thailand, the national healthcare system, and relevant laws, policies, and regulations.
RESULTS: The study revealed that Thailand has legislation mandating health examinations for domestically employed workers exposed to occupational risk factors, regulated by the Ministry of Labour, alongside standards for healthcare facilities delivering occupational health services established by the Ministry of Public Health. However, significant gaps remain, particularly in data integration and, importantly, the absence of a comprehensive occupational health care framework for Thai workers employed overseas.
CONCLUSION: Strengthening policy coherence between the Ministry of Labour and the Ministry of Public Health, together with the establishment of a national occupational safety and health institute, is recommended to support the sustainable development of occupational health services. In addition, international initiatives such as health checkup programs for Thai overseas workers provide a valuable platform for cross-border occupational health surveillance and continuity of care.