American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 1996
Laparoscopic salpingostomy versus laparoscopic local methotrexate injection in the management of unruptured ectopic gestation.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zilber U, Pansky M, Bukovsky I, Golan A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine whether laparoscopic salpingostomy is preferable to laparoscopic methotrexate injection in the management of unruptured tubal gestation.
STUDY DESIGN: Forty-eight patients with unruptured tubal pregnancy were prospectively randomized to either laparoscopic salpingostomy or laparoscopic local methotrexate injection in a university medical center. Operation time, duration of hospital stay, decrease in levels of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and fertility outcome were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The salpingostomy group had a longer operative time (p < 0.0001) but a shorter hospital stay (p < 0.01) and a lower incidence of persistent trophoblastic activity (5% vs 14%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. The time interval until beta-human chorionic gonadotropin disappearance was similar (13.9 and 13.7 days), and the subsequent intrauterine pregnancy rate was similar in the two groups (83.5% and 81%). One repeat tubal pregnancy occurred in the salpingostomy group.
CONCLUSIONS: Both these methods of conservative management are equally effective and each one has its merits.
STUDY DESIGN: Forty-eight patients with unruptured tubal pregnancy were prospectively randomized to either laparoscopic salpingostomy or laparoscopic local methotrexate injection in a university medical center. Operation time, duration of hospital stay, decrease in levels of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and fertility outcome were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The salpingostomy group had a longer operative time (p < 0.0001) but a shorter hospital stay (p < 0.01) and a lower incidence of persistent trophoblastic activity (5% vs 14%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. The time interval until beta-human chorionic gonadotropin disappearance was similar (13.9 and 13.7 days), and the subsequent intrauterine pregnancy rate was similar in the two groups (83.5% and 81%). One repeat tubal pregnancy occurred in the salpingostomy group.
CONCLUSIONS: Both these methods of conservative management are equally effective and each one has its merits.