Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2014
Evaluation of factors affecting recovery period in lower lip hypoesthesia after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ueki Koichiro, Sotobori Megumi, Ishihara Yuri, Iguchi Ran, Kosaka Akihiko, Ikawa Hiroumi, Moroi Akinori, Yoshizawa Kunio, Marukawa Kohei
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting the recovery period of lower lip hypoesthesia after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in mandibular prognathism patients using multivariate analysis, retrospectively.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 222 patients (444 sides) who underwent bilateral SSRO setback surgery with and without Le Fort I osteotomy. Trigeminal nerve hypoesthesia at the region of the lower lip was assessed bilaterally by the trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential (TSEP) method pre- and post-operatively. Recovery period was determined as the time when TSEP was first measurable post-operatively. Age, sex, presence or absence of third molars, setback amount and osteotomy type and fixation method were selected as covariates in the multivariate analysis. The factor affecting the recovery period in lower lip hypoesthesia was examined with Cox's proportional hazard regression.
RESULTS: Sex and osteotomy fixation method affected the recovery period in lower lip hypoesthesia significantly (P = 0.0132 and P = 0.0394). However, the other factors did not affect the recovery period.
CONCLUSION: This study suggested that sex and osteotomy type and fixation method may affect the recovery period in lower lip hypoesthesia after SSRO setback surgery.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 222 patients (444 sides) who underwent bilateral SSRO setback surgery with and without Le Fort I osteotomy. Trigeminal nerve hypoesthesia at the region of the lower lip was assessed bilaterally by the trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential (TSEP) method pre- and post-operatively. Recovery period was determined as the time when TSEP was first measurable post-operatively. Age, sex, presence or absence of third molars, setback amount and osteotomy type and fixation method were selected as covariates in the multivariate analysis. The factor affecting the recovery period in lower lip hypoesthesia was examined with Cox's proportional hazard regression.
RESULTS: Sex and osteotomy fixation method affected the recovery period in lower lip hypoesthesia significantly (P = 0.0132 and P = 0.0394). However, the other factors did not affect the recovery period.
CONCLUSION: This study suggested that sex and osteotomy type and fixation method may affect the recovery period in lower lip hypoesthesia after SSRO setback surgery.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Absorbable ImplantsAdolescentAdultAgedBiocompatible MaterialsBone PlatesBone ScrewsEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypesthesiaLip DiseasesMaleMaxillaMiddle AgedMolar, ThirdOsteotomy, Le FortOsteotomy, Sagittal Split RamusPrognathismRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsTitaniumTrigeminal Nerve InjuriesYoung Adult