MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.foot.2010.11.008

Медицинская библиотека · Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2010

Foot and ankle fractures at the supination line.

Schepers Tim, van Schie-van der Weert Esther M, de Vries Mark R, van der Elst Maarten

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The supination line is a fictive line along the foot and ankle, on which over twenty fracture types and approximately ten different ligamentous sprain-injuries have been identified.

OBJECTIVE

The current study was conducted to evaluate the incidence of different types of supination line injuries visible at the initial radiographs at the Emergency Department and to determine the type and percentage of misdiagnosed injuries.

METHOD: Retrospective study of consecutive patients who visited the Emergency Department, between January 1 and June 30, 2009, after sustaining an injury of the foot or ankle and had a radiograph taken within 24 h of the incident.

RESULTS

In the 6-month study period 1284 patients were included. In these cases the trauma mechanism was a sprain in 780 patients (60.7%). Of these patients 310 suffered from a fracture (40%). There were 36 (4.6%) false-positive cases and in 91 (11.7%) cases the initial diagnosis was false-negative. The number with a missed fracture expressed as a percentage of all patients with a fracture was 29.4% (91/310).

CONCLUSION

Detection of injuries along the supination line remains difficult. This study might aid in decreasing the number of misdiagnosed injuries, which is of value as these might negatively affect outcome.

Для цитирования: Schepers Tim, van Schie-van der Weert Esther M, de Vries Mark R, van der Elst Maarten. Foot and ankle fractures at the supination line.. Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2010.11.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.