MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12885-026-16118-8

Медицинская библиотека · BMC cancer · 2026

Proclarix' performance in ruling out patients with no or indolent prostate cancer: evaluation in a Danish population.

Schiess Ralph, Athanasiou Alcibiade, Kasten Madlen M E, Hansen Torben F, Kissow Gitte E, Obro Louise F, Madsen Jonna S, Poulsen Mads H, Osther Palle J, Zedan Ahmed H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

PSA testing is widely used for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa), but its low specificity leads to overdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions. Proclarix, a novel blood test combining serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA), percentage of free PSA (%fPSA), Cathepsin D (CTSD) and Thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) with age into a risk score, aims to improve risk stratification by predicting clinically significant PCa (csPCa). This study evaluated its diagnostic performance in a Danish population using retrospective serum samples collected consecutively from patients with suspected PCa.

METHODS

Proclarix' ability to reduce biopsies and detection of clinically insignificant PCa (ciPCa, defined as Grade Group < 2) was assessed in men with a PSA 2-10 ng/ml and a prostate volume of ≥ 35 ml (targeted population) compared with the percentage of free PSA (%fPSA) and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (ERSPC-RC). The secondary analysis included the performance of Proclarix' and Proclarix density compared with the %fPSA and PSA density (PSA-D) in a broader population with a PSA 2-20 ng/ml regardless of both prostate volume and DRE (extended population). Proclarix score is considered negative when it's below the cutoff 10%.

RESULTS

In the targeted population (n = 373), a negative Proclarix test significantly reduced the probability of csPCa from 27% (pretest) to 5% (posttest, 95%CI: 0-10%), (p < 0.028) outperforming %fPSA (posttest 14%, 95%CI: 4-24%) and ERSPC-RC (posttest 20%, 95%CI: 4-36%). For the diagnosis of csPCa, Proclarix had a significantly (p < 0.01) greater specificity of 22% (95%CI: 17-27%) at 97% sensitivity (95%CI: 94-100%) and 95% NPV (95%CI: 90-100%) than did %fPSA and the ERSPC-RC, with 14% (95%CI: 10-18%) and 7% (95%CI: 4-11%) specificity, respectively. In the extended population (n = 656), Proclarix density had significantly (p < 0.01) greater specificity (39%, 95%CI: 35-44%) than did PSA-D (32%, 95%CI: 27-36%) at an equal sensitivity of 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

Proclarix reduces prostate biopsies and ciPCa detection while maintaining a low risk of missing csPCa.

Для цитирования: Schiess Ralph, Athanasiou Alcibiade, Kasten Madlen M E, Hansen Torben F, Kissow Gitte E, Obro Louise F, Madsen Jonna S, Poulsen Mads H, Osther Palle J, Zedan Ahmed H. Proclarix' performance in ruling out patients with no or indolent prostate cancer: evaluation in a Danish population.. BMC cancer. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-026-16118-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.