MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Neurologia (Barcelona, Spain) · 2007

[Horner's syndrome secondary to epidural anesthesia].

Varela C, Palacio F, Reina M A, López A, Benito-León J

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The Horner's syndrome in association with the anesthetic techniques is produced by a blockade of the stellate ganglion sympathetic fibers. This complication is produced by the local anesthetic non-expected migration when it is administered either in the epidural space while performing an epidural block or inside the aponeurosis vascular elements during the performance of a brachial plexus block. Its evolution is quick, with benign incident that disappears in a few hours, without leaving any sequels. It can occur in patients without any previous clinical condition.

CLINICAL CASE: We described the case of 28 years old pregnant woman, with a body mass index of 40.6, without any previous neurological background, who was admitted into hospital for labour. She had epidural analgesia and needed a caesarean section 2 hours later. Twenty minutes after the administration of an epidural dose of local anesthetic, the patient developed a completed left side Horner's Syndrome, as well as ipsi-lateral brachial paresis, that lasted for three hours, with complete recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Several etiopathologenic options were considered at the time, such as a possible subdural or paravertebral migration of the local anesthetic, the influence of the patient's position (decubitus) and the possible existence of fibrotic compartments in the epidurals space.

Для цитирования: Varela C, Palacio F, Reina M A, López A, Benito-León J. [Horner's syndrome secondary to epidural anesthesia].. Neurologia (Barcelona, Spain). 2007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.