MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/23259671221143539

Медицинская библиотека · Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023

Comparative Success of Repair Versus Reconstruction for Knee Extra-articular Ligament Injuries.

Kahan Joseph B, Burroughs Patrick, Mclaughlin William M, Schneble Christopher A, Moran Jay, Joo Peter Y, Modrak Maxwell, Richter Dustin L, Wascher Daniel, Treme Gehron P, Schenck Robert C, Grauer Jonathan N, Medvecky Michael J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Surgical techniques and associated outcomes in treating acute and chronic extra-articular ligament knee injuries are in evolution, and there is question as to whether repair or reconstruction is optimal.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the subsequent surgery rate between surgical repair versus reconstruction for all extra-articular ligament injuries of the knee utilizing a large database. Our hypothesis was that overall surgical repair of both lateral and medial extra-articular knee injuries would have a higher revision rate than those treated by reconstruction.

STUDY

DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The PearlDiver Mariner data set (2010-2019), with 122 million patients, was utilized to generate 2 patient cohorts: those who underwent surgical repair and those who underwent surgical reconstruction of a knee extra-articular ligament injury. All patients had a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Rates of concomitant or subsequent cruciate ligament reconstruction and rates of secondary procedures were assessed and compared between the 2 cohorts.

RESULTS

In total, 3563 patients were identified: extra-articular ligament reconstruction was performed for 2405 (67.5%), and repair was performed for 1158 (32.5%). Cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed for 986 (27.7%), of which 888 of 986 (90.1%) were performed on the same day as their extra-articular ligament procedure. At 2-year follow-up, the reconstruction cohort had higher rates of revision surgery compared with the repair cohort (8.2% vs 2.5%; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Using a large national database, knee extra-articular ligamentous reconstructions (those on both the lateral and the medial side) had a 3.3 times higher rate of revision surgery compared with repair at 2-year follow-up. Further study is needed to investigate the causes leading to revision surgery and to determine the optimal surgical treatment for both medial and lateral extra-articular knee ligament injuries.

Для цитирования: Kahan Joseph B, Burroughs Patrick, Mclaughlin William M, Schneble Christopher A, Moran Jay, Joo Peter Y, Modrak Maxwell, Richter Dustin L, Wascher Daniel, Treme Gehron P, Schenck Robert C, Grauer Jonathan N, Medvecky Michael J. Comparative Success of Repair Versus Reconstruction for Knee Extra-articular Ligament Injuries.. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221143539.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.