MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jar.70161

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026

Views of Facial Attractiveness of Faces of Individuals With and Without an Intellectual Disability.

Whitby-Tillott Harriet, Donnachie Madeline, Jones Benedict, Jahoda Andrew

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Little is known about people with intellectual disabilities' views of facial attractiveness and and how desirable they feel they are (self-desirability).

METHOD: Twenty-four adults with intellectual disabilities and twenty-five adults without disabilities were recruited from further education colleges and voluntary community organisations. Participants were asked to rate the attractiveness of facial images of typically developing individuals and individuals with Down syndrome. This was followed by a semi-structured interview, exploring participants with intellectual disabilities' perceptions of self-desirability.

RESULTS

The participants with intellectual disabilities gave consistent attractiveness ratings when evaluating images of people with an intellectual disability. They were also more likely, than not, to perceive themselves as desirable to those they found attractive.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that people with intellectual disabilities make sophisticated intuitive judgments about the facial attractiveness of other people with and without intellectual disabilities, and remain positive about their own attractiveness.

Для цитирования: Whitby-Tillott Harriet, Donnachie Madeline, Jones Benedict, Jahoda Andrew. Views of Facial Attractiveness of Faces of Individuals With and Without an Intellectual Disability.. Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/jar.70161.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.