Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons · 2022
Callus distraction for brachymetatarsia - A comparison between an internal device and the external fixator.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Toporowski Gregor, Thiesen Roman, Gosheger Georg, Roedl Robert, Frommer Adrien, Laufer Andrea, Rölfing Jan Duedal, Vogt Bjoern
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic patients with severe brachymetatarsia are commonly treated with callus distraction using external mini-fixator (EF) or internal device (ID). This study points out advantages and limitations of both methods comparing clinical and radiographical parameters.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 21 metatarsal bones in twelve patients. Twelve metatarsals were treated with ID (Genos Mini), nine with EF (MiniRail).
RESULTS: Mean lengthening distance was 17.3 mm using EF and 11.7 mm using ID (p = 0.016). Adverse results were observed in 89% of metatarsals treated with EF and in 33% treated with ID (p = 0.011). Postoperative surgical intervention was required in 33% using EF compared to 0% using ID (p = 0.031). Mean total German Foot Function Index (FFI-T) improved from 49 to 33 using EF and from 47 to 22 using ID (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: CD is a reliable surgical treatment for BMT. Surgeons should be aware of implant-related advantages and complications when counseling patients about treatment options.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 21 metatarsal bones in twelve patients. Twelve metatarsals were treated with ID (Genos Mini), nine with EF (MiniRail).
RESULTS: Mean lengthening distance was 17.3 mm using EF and 11.7 mm using ID (p = 0.016). Adverse results were observed in 89% of metatarsals treated with EF and in 33% treated with ID (p = 0.011). Postoperative surgical intervention was required in 33% using EF compared to 0% using ID (p = 0.031). Mean total German Foot Function Index (FFI-T) improved from 49 to 33 using EF and from 47 to 22 using ID (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: CD is a reliable surgical treatment for BMT. Surgeons should be aware of implant-related advantages and complications when counseling patients about treatment options.